The most extensive and inclusive voter fraud operation does not include checking up on people registered 100 years ago to see if they're even still alive or real voters.
And they said this was the most secure election in history. I'm starting to think they mean the result was "secure".
Of course it is. But a lot of states, hell even private companies, will rig their own data storage or data systems because of bugs or mistakes.
Think for a second, if this wasn’t intentional, and they were just trying to jigger the system so these people could come in and vote and this wasn’t part of “THE” fraud?
Now, this needs to end. This means they need a new system. This means that you need to get this right next time. We can’t keep doing it this way. But it doesn’t mean it was part of “the“ fraud. We need to be careful not to fall into traps.
We also need to get into every state by electing our own people and making sure we fix this shit.
I agree with you, that is probable, but poor data integrity is essentially fraud.
The most extensive and inclusive voter fraud operation does not include checking up on people registered 100 years ago to see if they're even still alive or real voters.
And they said this was the most secure election in history. I'm starting to think they mean the result was "secure".
Of course it is. But a lot of states, hell even private companies, will rig their own data storage or data systems because of bugs or mistakes.
Think for a second, if this wasn’t intentional, and they were just trying to jigger the system so these people could come in and vote and this wasn’t part of “THE” fraud?
Now, this needs to end. This means they need a new system. This means that you need to get this right next time. We can’t keep doing it this way. But it doesn’t mean it was part of “the“ fraud. We need to be careful not to fall into traps.
We also need to get into every state by electing our own people and making sure we fix this shit.