The most extensive and inclusive voter fraud operation does not include checking up on people registered 100 years ago to see if they're even still alive or real voters.
And they said this was the most secure election in history. I'm starting to think they mean the result was "secure".
Of course it is. But a lot of states, hell even private companies, will rig their own data storage or data systems because of bugs or mistakes.
Think for a second, if this wasn’t intentional, and they were just trying to jigger the system so these people could come in and vote and this wasn’t part of “THE” fraud?
Now, this needs to end. This means they need a new system. This means that you need to get this right next time. We can’t keep doing it this way. But it doesn’t mean it was part of “the“ fraud. We need to be careful not to fall into traps.
We also need to get into every state by electing our own people and making sure we fix this shit.
I agree with your theory that this is likely a data integrity issue. My concern is that data integrity is central to fair and honest elections. If they cannot keep track of voter ages, how do they know voters are old enough (or real)? If they cannot keep track of voter ages, what other data integrity mistakes are they making in this system? Or are we to believe everything is 100% accurate, except these dates.
And if these voters are real and not fraudulent voters (which I’m pretty sure they are not real voters) are even still alive? Though I think we all know they are not real voters, and you know they all voted for Xidan.
Follow up question, are we finding these irregularities in some of the states that Trump won?
I don’t think we found any, have we?
This particular instance may be an “innocent“ data integrity issue and not part of the fraud that we all know happened. But to my knowledge I don’t think this happened in any of the states that went for Trump. Some have said that there have been, but I don’t really know.
I agree with you, that is probable, but poor data integrity is essentially fraud.
The most extensive and inclusive voter fraud operation does not include checking up on people registered 100 years ago to see if they're even still alive or real voters.
And they said this was the most secure election in history. I'm starting to think they mean the result was "secure".
Of course it is. But a lot of states, hell even private companies, will rig their own data storage or data systems because of bugs or mistakes.
Think for a second, if this wasn’t intentional, and they were just trying to jigger the system so these people could come in and vote and this wasn’t part of “THE” fraud?
Now, this needs to end. This means they need a new system. This means that you need to get this right next time. We can’t keep doing it this way. But it doesn’t mean it was part of “the“ fraud. We need to be careful not to fall into traps.
We also need to get into every state by electing our own people and making sure we fix this shit.
I agree with your theory that this is likely a data integrity issue. My concern is that data integrity is central to fair and honest elections. If they cannot keep track of voter ages, how do they know voters are old enough (or real)? If they cannot keep track of voter ages, what other data integrity mistakes are they making in this system? Or are we to believe everything is 100% accurate, except these dates.
And if these voters are real and not fraudulent voters (which I’m pretty sure they are not real voters) are even still alive? Though I think we all know they are not real voters, and you know they all voted for Xidan.
Follow up question, are we finding these irregularities in some of the states that Trump won?
I don’t think we found any, have we?
This particular instance may be an “innocent“ data integrity issue and not part of the fraud that we all know happened. But to my knowledge I don’t think this happened in any of the states that went for Trump. Some have said that there have been, but I don’t really know.
And they all vote at 3am?
If the data integrity is this poor then the election should NEVER have been certified. Thats fraud.
Oh I’m in agreement there.
This is exactly what happened. In 2005/6 WI went from communities keep registration data to one central database.
In some small communities they didn't save date of birth or registration date