Biden “WON” the state of Wisconsin by a mere 20,684 votes... 115,252 of WI “voters” were over 100 years old, with many of those on the voter rolls since? ... Exactly 1/1/1918. - The Great Awakening

Biden “WON” the state of Wisconsin by a mere 20,684 votes... 115,252 of WI “voters” were over 100 years old, with many of those on the voter rolls since? ... Exactly 1/1/1918. (media.greatawakening.win)

posted 2 years ago by purkiss80 2 years ago by purkiss80 +700 / -3

116 comments download

116 comments share download save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (116)

sorted by:

▲ 6 ▼

– repeatoffender 6 points 2 years ago +6 / -0

I agree with your theory that this is likely a data integrity issue. My concern is that data integrity is central to fair and honest elections. If they cannot keep track of voter ages, how do they know voters are old enough (or real)? If they cannot keep track of voter ages, what other data integrity mistakes are they making in this system? Or are we to believe everything is 100% accurate, except these dates.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– GDZeus 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

And if these voters are real and not fraudulent voters (which I’m pretty sure they are not real voters) are even still alive? Though I think we all know they are not real voters, and you know they all voted for Xidan.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 0 ▼

– SkepButOpen 0 points 2 years ago +1 / -1

Follow up question, are we finding these irregularities in some of the states that Trump won?

I don’t think we found any, have we?

This particular instance may be an “innocent“ data integrity issue and not part of the fraud that we all know happened. But to my knowledge I don’t think this happened in any of the states that went for Trump. Some have said that there have been, but I don’t really know.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q