So it would appear.
(media.gab.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (208)
sorted by:
Character matters, not colour.
when one group disproportionately kills and rapes another...i will be wary around that group.
A "group" doesn't make individual decisions to commit crimes. Individuals make the choice to commit crimes... Unless you're prepared to be held accountable for all crimes committed by those with whom you share some superficial quality such as a pallor.
You're correct. So why does one group commit so much more?
It's a cultural issue. You dont address the violence by going after the race, you address it by going after the culture that fosters the issue. Gang culture, thug culture
Not sure if you've noticed, but white people get caught up in these cultures sometimes too, meaning it isn't racial at its roots
"You're correct." <--- Claims to agree with statement.
"So why does one group commit..." <--- Tries to pretend statement did not occur.
Again, GROUPS of people don't make the individual choice to commit crimes. INDIVIDUALS make the INDIVIDUAL choice to commit crimes.
If you need to read that a third time, I'm here for you.
Because Democrat influence is strong and we need to remove it. Until everyone is given a fair shot, the data is corrupted.
But we also need to abolish most of our laws too. People should not be in prison of selling marijuana. Hell anti marijuana laws are unconstitutional.
Sure are a whole lot of violent black ‘individuals’ out there. They have not held up their end of the bargain when we granted them civil rights. I understand why Jim Crow laws were enabled. Mass looting is another example, looters need to be shot on sight.
"Sure are a whole lot of violent black ‘individuals’ out there." Sure are a whole lot of violent, stupid white "individuals" out there, too. Since you're never going to 'punish' an entire race based solely ON their race, without getting your own asses 'punished' for that, the premise is too retarded to matter.
Right. So why are pit bulls more likely to kill than a golden retriever?
Because most of them are owned by blacks.
"pit bull" isn't a race. Also, what does this faulty premise have to do with Q, WN troll?
Because they're usually owned by people who want them to be mean or fight because the stereotype that they're mean persists. I've met more than enough amazing rescue pit bulls and they were perfectly loving and normal dogs. Yet the sigma continues. Your stupid racist gotchas and metaphors still don't and won't work.
Yes and that would overwhelmingly be the Jews. So stop getting your panties twisted with "muh racism". I get called a nazi here sometimes for my beliefs about the Holocaust, but what you've been spouting off here about not all humans being equal is actual nonsense.
Lol if you think I’m some fan of the Jews then you’re wrong. And I’m not wrong. It just hurts your feelings
Where did I say you were praising Jews? Im saying they are the only ones that actually stand out as the group pushing psyops and trying to enslave the working class.
If you're spouting off about white supremacy and denigrating black people or other non-whites then you definitely are wrong.
Nothing wrong with being a "nazi", but very much wrong with being a white supremacist. And no, feelings have nothing to do with it. Objectively there are based people of all groups and races.