Explanation of ruling blocking EO For federal employees in comments
(media.communities.win)
🏡 Local WIN 🏘️
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (57)
sorted by:
Excellent explanation anon. This legal landscape is very calculated and your breakdown of these rulings can help many see the forest. Thanks.
I read legal jumbo all day, saw people asking for clarification. Glad to help when I can!
The present legal "system" uses language to obfuscate legal issues as evidenced by the fact that lawyers are needed to interpret "legal decisions" for their clients..
Congress's Article II exclusive right and obligation is to make law, but aren't they almost done after more than two centuries? Maybe a tweak here and there but.... Asking for a Fren.
I do believe God's Laws are the original foundation of the Constitution-the Ten Commandments being removed is proof the existing system does NOT please God... Work off them to cover modern contingencies (at a low maximum) and the legal linguists will need training..
Never forget that in our current system only lawyers are allowed to judge/punish other lawyers. The Bar is made up of all lawyers and only they are allowed to punish lawyers.
What’s funny is it’s typically the paralegals that write the drafts. Judges use previous case law to evidence their decision, that’s where a lot of people get lost but it also helps bc you can go back and reference it. If you use that old English assignment and take out all the big words and unnecessary language, it becomes easier to read.
So ol' Billy boy sayin "Depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is.."
😎
u/#Flynnarmy