Include links and don't bother with links to any site like gatewaypundit or any other site that they can attack by reeeight-wing arguments.
What we need is CDC and .edu / .gov an similar 'beyond reproach' sites that can't be given canned responses or ostriched to death.............
We do need links, but the researchers here know how to get the beyond reproach sites from them. Gatewaypundit might link to a cdc/.edu/.gov report that can be extracted and placed in the comments.
Request a link if there is none though, or deport -> other -> 'NEEDS A LINK/SAUCE' -> save and mods will get on it.
Yep, a discerning anon knows how to dig up the sources, and gateway pundit etc are at least good at providing sources even if their opinion pieces are meh.
True, but often there is a time window where a comment is effectively applied(when post replied to is on top and getting some attention) and while pundit often do provide links(not always to a beyond reproach source) I just used them as a well known example.
The thing is, we're not just in this for ourselves and waking people up requires effective ammo against them, our opinion of it doesn't really matter, it's the effect on target that matters............
Oh i know that anon, this is my red-pill ammo depot.
some of the videos from sources like the pundit are useful
For us, yes.
For redpilling NPC's and people clinging to and defending the official narrative, not so much...
Yes no link is worthless, but I would have to say a .gov or .edu link is probably just as worthless lol.
Not from an argument against shills and NPC's standpoint, more about getting them into stunned mullet mode than anything else.
I know was just being funny :) you are completely right!
Soon, Facebook Factcheckers: "CDC is providing misinformation"
If a screenshot is the best you can capture, get a shot of the authors.
Leave Fu king out of this!
Dude, you think anything on the CDC or .gov pages is legit at all? FFS, the Babylon Bee is way more accurate than some of the CDC shit.
Sorry, but big tech has managed to corrupt everything. People should know their sources, verify what they can, and do their best to note potential issues when posting shit. Trustworthy independent journalists are not easy to find these days.
Not about whether or not it's legit, it's about how it is perceived by the people one is trying to get through to.
One thing at a time, you can't take a bite out of the core of something without first starting at the surface to get to it, CDC is a sorting out for later thing....