Breaking 911: FDA revokes Emergency Use Authorization for Monoclonal Antibody treatment for Covid-19
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (174)
sorted by:
I just read an article from a south Florida news site reporting and confirming this is true. Looks like the FDA is pushing for the Pfizer and Merck antiviral pills. This is so wrong.
The Merck pill is particularly heinous. A family member who worked for them when it was first scrapped became angry upon the announcement that they’d allow it for use against COVID. As he said, “there’s no way in hell you’d get me to take that.”
The Merck pill in particular has the nasty side effects of toxicity to the patient and to the patient’s reproductive system/unborn child as well as increased affinity for mutation in the virus being treated.
I weirdly consider the Pfizer approval a win; not because it’ll help anyone, because it’s basically the FDA admitting Luc Montagnier is right and they did add part of the HIV genome to the virus. Which means they kind of also admit ivermectin should work due to its ability to act against HIV replication.
The monoclonal antibodies are not without problems either. It is still an experimental treatment. In the case of Regen-Cov, it uses engineered synthetic IgG antibodies - while others not in wide use, have antibodies derived from humanized mice. Like the vaxxines, there are no long term studies on these biologics. For those that object to vaxxines on religious grounds due to fetal cell use either in production or in research, should also have to object to mABs for the same reasons. Also, as previously stated, these drugs are still experimental. So, anyone taking them is participating in a drug trial.
Now that the manufacturers have sufficient data from the phase 3 trials of these biologics, they can be withdrawn from use in the US while studies around the world I believe are continuing. In the US, they are trying to push their next trials for dangerous recycled HIV antivirals. Like HCQ and Ivermectin, they have to pull the plug on anything that may actually work - even though the long term risks of mABs are still unknown. These companies have file cabinets full of experimental drugs that under any other circumstance would not be able to distributed to the public due to the dangers.
Early treatment is key and we have to keep pushing the message out there. People cannot wait two or three days to seek treatment. Any viral illness needs to be treated within 72 hours to be successful - especially for anyone in a high risk category. The problem that I continue to see is that people, even those that consider themselves awakened, are waiting too long to start treatment. As soon as symptoms appear, that is when treatment should begin. A person does not need to have a diagnosis or wait to see how sick they become to begin treatment. This is foolish. Have supplies on hand that in the event of any viral infection, treatment can be started. The lower the viral load, the less likely a person is going to suffer from the inflammatory sequala. The inflammatory response and secondary bacterial infections are what kill people - not the initial viral infection.
Nominate you to take Faucinsteins place!.... I have Ivermectin and HCQ if my family needs it....
Thanks for the vote of confidence, but playing politics is not my idea of a good time. Glad to hear to are prepared. God bless.