You seem to be conveniently ignoring the glaring questions i asked so ill repeat them again.
Since you said HELLO GEORGE is talking about soros i asked you this: how is soros referenced in other drops?
And then you ignored this question too. "Q also said no outside comms. So is george news highly connected and speaking on behalf of the Q team or is it someone like us who is simply paying attention and wants to profit off it?"
Soros is referred to several different ways in the drops, much of which is open to interpretation.
But do those diffrent ways repeat? Is there anywhere he was referred to as "george" besides in 592?
because they don't claim to be Q, or even claim to be connected to Q
Obviously they wouldnt directly associate with Q because that would make it very obvious if they were a larp or not. You say they arent a larp but do they claim to have high up connections? Do they drop "breadcrumbs" like Q does? It sounds like an imitator to me. In your own words could you describe george news?
You seem to be conveniently ignoring the glaring questions i asked so ill repeat them again.
Since you said HELLO GEORGE is talking about soros i asked you this: how is soros referenced in other drops?
And then you ignored this question too. "Q also said no outside comms. So is george news highly connected and speaking on behalf of the Q team or is it someone like us who is simply paying attention and wants to profit off it?"
I addressed all of those points.
You did not. You asked why it has to be about profit and then told me to go check out george.
Ill repeat myself again.
Those things are not as relevant as the fact that the Q drop does not say what you said it says. Look it up - #529
But for argument's sake, Soros is referred to several different ways in the drops, much of which is open to interpretation.
And I already explained why "no outside comms" does not pertain to George News (because they don't claim to be Q, or even claim to be connected to Q).
Once again, this time would have been better spent actually looking into George yourself. Arguing when you don't have the facts accomplishes nothing.
But do those diffrent ways repeat? Is there anywhere he was referred to as "george" besides in 592?
Obviously they wouldnt directly associate with Q because that would make it very obvious if they were a larp or not. You say they arent a larp but do they claim to have high up connections? Do they drop "breadcrumbs" like Q does? It sounds like an imitator to me. In your own words could you describe george news?