So how long has that tech existed and not been used?
How can that tech be used against an unsuspecting populace?
Who would monitor how the tech is implemented?
I said to burn that shit for a reason!
How often does the King change with the Guard?
"will never make it to the platform" is beyond suspicious, CCP loves doing shit like that!
I don't need to convince the people on 4 chan that Zionists are evil as fuck, I need to convince the rest of the world.
If we want DJT back
I don't give a fuck about DJT. Don't get me wrong, I am happy he has done what he has done. But what he has done is be part of a team to free We The People from Tyranny. Censoring speech in any way is the opposite of that freedom.
I will NOT trade one tyrant for another. Censoring my "anti-semeitc hate speech" when I talk about how the Zionists are trying to take over the planet will earn you a one way ticket to me doing everything in my power to take you down.
Trump's platform does not get a free pass on Tyranny "because it's Trump."
Seriously, have people learned nothing about the Cabal?
The average person would quickly lose their minds being exposed to the 4chan environment. The reality is that raw unfiltered truth is simply too heavy for the masses all at once.
A platform like Truth Social would be a wonderful environment covering the middle ground between clueless leftism and the 4chan hurtbox. People need to be warmed up slowly, one step at a time, in a polite environment. This is a process that will require order and organization, within which censorship will be a tool.
In the case of Truth Social, I am hopeful the censorship will not be tyranny and instead be that of guidance and cultivation.
Society self-censors. That is how it works. Purposeful censorship is only used to hide the truth. Believing that people need to be "weaned into the truth" is nothing but "nannyism". People will listen to whatever is available if people believe it is safe to listen. That is both a blessing and a curse, but it is how it is.
When exposed to the truth, a person will reject or accept it depending on how much cognitive dissonance (CD) they experience v. the strength of the evidence. Both must be considered. If someone is exposed to "the truth" without sufficient evidence they will reject it if it causes too much CD. If however someone is exposed to the evidence in an environment that they consider safe, they will very likely listen if it isn't too harsh.
We seem to be mostly in agreement on the above paragraph. The conflict is, I know that people self censor. They themselves reject the evidence if it is presented in a way that they deem harmful. There should never be some overlord making that decision for someone. They will do it for themselves. Then those who present good arguments, with good evidence, with minimal CD will be listened to, no matter the topic.
The idea that we need people deciding for us how to censor the information we receive is the fraud that we have been taught our whole lives via The Matrix that we live in. We must stop thinking that way, we must trust ourselves to be able to do our own thinking and censoring, and we must trust others to do so also.
A person can tell right away if a post is something they want to read or not. The idea that a "free speech" platform will turn into 4 chan is ludicrous. 4 chan is 4 chan because there are no other types of voices there. Not because there are "those" types of voices there.
Whew... you sure told me. Irony of course being you are STILL on a Q forum for Trump Supporters and there actually isn't free speech even here. So you can feel free just to fuck the hell off.
Ahem. What did I say that was anti-Trump or anti-Q? Everything I said was anti-Tyranny. I'm pretty sure you didn't read what I wrote or didn't understand it.
Fucking tard.... unless you own/operate the forum... it's fucking HOUSE rules. Truth Social will be DJT's fucking HOUSE. You planning on trying to take a shit on it?
Chan or Voat or Kun is one thing... places like this or Truth Social are another. You don't know dick about me... but I cut my teeth on smart mouth snot noses and I like it.
Agree but the you have to have a defense against radical abuse — we all expect the bots will be deployed to overrun every post or page with vile filth, to drown out actual free speech, and deploy their “wrap-up smear” tactic. Our mods here boot these infiltrators.
Why do people keep bringing up "bots" when I make statements about "hate speech" and "bullying"? Bots need to be eliminated. I am not, nor will I ever contest that. I did not SPEAK about bots, so bringing up, "but bots" as a counter argument is not an address of my statement at all.
Kill all bots: Yes.
Limit my speech in any way: It will become my life's goal to ruin you.
Fine with me. And a place where young minds can go learn, that is an idea I like. It's either this or allow everything the way Gab does, and I am sick of the rhetoric, never appreciated the blatant Jew hatred, and other bashing. If people want that option, then, they can use Gab or even...horror of horrors...reddit or something. I started on reddit with thedonald, I know what that progressive shithole is like. What ever happened to old-fashioned debates about facts and/or opinions? 'member when in public school they had debate clubs, where sides were presented and one of the participants elected to be the "devil's advocate"? Do they still do that, or only in law school?! Libtards seem incapable of it entirely... they can't discuss two sides of anything without hysterics and vitriolic attacks. They should have debate club on Truth Social. Imagine how informative that would be. One for adults, and one for kids in school.
I enjoy discourse that reinforces personal responsibility for thoughts and actions. As it largely is here on GA. So refreshing. As for people who don't want Truth Social to be family-friendly? Here is a thought... just don't fucking go there.
I got no issue with Truth Social being family friendly.
So how long has that tech existed and not been used? How can that tech be used against an unsuspecting populace? Who would monitor how the tech is implemented?
I said to burn that shit for a reason!
How often does the King change with the Guard?
"will never make it to the platform" is beyond suspicious, CCP loves doing shit like that!
Any system that censors my "hate speech" and "bullying" will be a target for me to take down.
We either have free speech or we don't. There is no "mostly free."
I agree! Like it or not who decides what speech is hateful or not! That is what started this mess!
Take it to 4 chan then. If we want DJT back... my personal preferences, don't trump his on his platform. I don't think it's unreasonable.
I'm sure Torba will appreciate your support since he's made it clear how he feels about Truth Social.
I don't need to convince the people on 4 chan that Zionists are evil as fuck, I need to convince the rest of the world.
I don't give a fuck about DJT. Don't get me wrong, I am happy he has done what he has done. But what he has done is be part of a team to free We The People from Tyranny. Censoring speech in any way is the opposite of that freedom.
I will NOT trade one tyrant for another. Censoring my "anti-semeitc hate speech" when I talk about how the Zionists are trying to take over the planet will earn you a one way ticket to me doing everything in my power to take you down.
Trump's platform does not get a free pass on Tyranny "because it's Trump."
Seriously, have people learned nothing about the Cabal?
The average person would quickly lose their minds being exposed to the 4chan environment. The reality is that raw unfiltered truth is simply too heavy for the masses all at once.
A platform like Truth Social would be a wonderful environment covering the middle ground between clueless leftism and the 4chan hurtbox. People need to be warmed up slowly, one step at a time, in a polite environment. This is a process that will require order and organization, within which censorship will be a tool.
In the case of Truth Social, I am hopeful the censorship will not be tyranny and instead be that of guidance and cultivation.
Society self-censors. That is how it works. Purposeful censorship is only used to hide the truth. Believing that people need to be "weaned into the truth" is nothing but "nannyism". People will listen to whatever is available if people believe it is safe to listen. That is both a blessing and a curse, but it is how it is.
When exposed to the truth, a person will reject or accept it depending on how much cognitive dissonance (CD) they experience v. the strength of the evidence. Both must be considered. If someone is exposed to "the truth" without sufficient evidence they will reject it if it causes too much CD. If however someone is exposed to the evidence in an environment that they consider safe, they will very likely listen if it isn't too harsh.
We seem to be mostly in agreement on the above paragraph. The conflict is, I know that people self censor. They themselves reject the evidence if it is presented in a way that they deem harmful. There should never be some overlord making that decision for someone. They will do it for themselves. Then those who present good arguments, with good evidence, with minimal CD will be listened to, no matter the topic.
The idea that we need people deciding for us how to censor the information we receive is the fraud that we have been taught our whole lives via The Matrix that we live in. We must stop thinking that way, we must trust ourselves to be able to do our own thinking and censoring, and we must trust others to do so also.
A person can tell right away if a post is something they want to read or not. The idea that a "free speech" platform will turn into 4 chan is ludicrous. 4 chan is 4 chan because there are no other types of voices there. Not because there are "those" types of voices there.
Whew... you sure told me. Irony of course being you are STILL on a Q forum for Trump Supporters and there actually isn't free speech even here. So you can feel free just to fuck the hell off.
If you think what I said had any ironic connection with this statement, then you either didn't read what I wrote, or you didn't understand it.
Also not "ironic" since I have posted hundreds of times about this very topic. So less "ironic" and more "consistent with what I said in my post."
I don't fucking care if you post a thousand times a DAY... you are STILL on a pro Trump Q forum retard.
Ahem. What did I say that was anti-Trump or anti-Q? Everything I said was anti-Tyranny. I'm pretty sure you didn't read what I wrote or didn't understand it.
Go lick Torbas asshole faggot.
Blind fool, 1st ammendment protects our free speech, hateful or not!
Fucking tard.... unless you own/operate the forum... it's fucking HOUSE rules. Truth Social will be DJT's fucking HOUSE. You planning on trying to take a shit on it?
Fuck right the hell off.
Ha ha...you are triggered Libtard!
Chan or Voat or Kun is one thing... places like this or Truth Social are another. You don't know dick about me... but I cut my teeth on smart mouth snot noses and I like it.
Agree but the you have to have a defense against radical abuse — we all expect the bots will be deployed to overrun every post or page with vile filth, to drown out actual free speech, and deploy their “wrap-up smear” tactic. Our mods here boot these infiltrators.
Why do people keep bringing up "bots" when I make statements about "hate speech" and "bullying"? Bots need to be eliminated. I am not, nor will I ever contest that. I did not SPEAK about bots, so bringing up, "but bots" as a counter argument is not an address of my statement at all.
Kill all bots: Yes.
Limit my speech in any way: It will become my life's goal to ruin you.
Fair enough.
Never trust an AI to make value judgments.
You mean like Google's AI that determined 90% of online hate speech was targeted at straight white males?
It will be the place where we win the hearts of the normies. Don’t need to give the black pills there. Well give them later.
no chance trump will censor bullying and “hate speech”
Fine with me. And a place where young minds can go learn, that is an idea I like. It's either this or allow everything the way Gab does, and I am sick of the rhetoric, never appreciated the blatant Jew hatred, and other bashing. If people want that option, then, they can use Gab or even...horror of horrors...reddit or something. I started on reddit with thedonald, I know what that progressive shithole is like. What ever happened to old-fashioned debates about facts and/or opinions? 'member when in public school they had debate clubs, where sides were presented and one of the participants elected to be the "devil's advocate"? Do they still do that, or only in law school?! Libtards seem incapable of it entirely... they can't discuss two sides of anything without hysterics and vitriolic attacks. They should have debate club on Truth Social. Imagine how informative that would be. One for adults, and one for kids in school. I enjoy discourse that reinforces personal responsibility for thoughts and actions. As it largely is here on GA. So refreshing. As for people who don't want Truth Social to be family-friendly? Here is a thought... just don't fucking go there.
The AI will censor a lot of Trump’s posts.