That’s cruel and unusual. What good does it do? They can still harm children. It’d be more humane to kill them. Moreover, why not? Does somebody want them around? I have to think that it’s because we’re talking about Russia and half of them are probably innocent / political opposition / etc.
It's been shown that capital punishment is not a deterrent to crime. Neither are mandatory minimum sentencing. Criminals gonna crime, that's just how it goes.
Also because the toppling was committed by Soros stormtroopers and it was too heavy a price to pay. It would be like walking his soldiers into machine gun fire, so he gave the order to stand down.
That’s cruel and unusual. What good does it do? They can still harm children. It’d be more humane to kill them. Moreover, why not? Does somebody want them around? I have to think that it’s because we’re talking about Russia and half of them are probably innocent / political opposition / etc.
It's been shown that capital punishment is not a deterrent to crime. Neither are mandatory minimum sentencing. Criminals gonna crime, that's just how it goes.
Then I wonder why statues stopped being toppled when a penalty of only 10 yrs was imposed
Plus of course it deters the executed prisoner from committing further child rapes
Because toppling statues was more of a "fad" than anything else. There is no long-standing derangement of the populace to topple statues.
States without the death penalty have lower murder rates. https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/stories/states-with-no-death-penalty-share-lower-homicide-rates
Also because the toppling was committed by Soros stormtroopers and it was too heavy a price to pay. It would be like walking his soldiers into machine gun fire, so he gave the order to stand down.
Good points. What is the standard of proof? Made up charges happen like you point out political motives or whatever.