Greetings Anons!
I present to you Chapter III of the Department of Defense Law of War Manual – Applications of the Law of War, read aloud for your listening pleasure!
This is a continuation of my DoD Law of War audio video series. As mentioned in my original thread; In translating this manual to audio and video, I hope to bring more researchers into the discussion of the Law of War manual. This manual is a quintessential document for Q research, and should be read, or listened to in its entirety by all members of The Great Awakening board.
Please use this thread to discuss any pertinent or interesting findings in the Law of War manual as you listen along. It is my intention that these stickied threads be a place for anons to gather and conduct research on individual chapters of the Law of War and any connections to the Q postings that may be found within. Chapter III of the Law of War has connections to the 11.3 marker and the topic of belligerent occupation that are worth looking into.
Today’s chapter is titled: Applications of the Law of War, and covers the following topics:
1.Introduction to the Application of the Law of War
2.Situations to Which the Law of War Applies
3.Status of the Parties and the Law of War
4.When Jus in Bello Rules Apply
5.Relationship between Jus in Bello and Jus ad Bellum
6.Reciprocity and Law of War Rules
7.Applying Rules by Analogy
8.End of Hostilities and the Application of the Law of War
9.Law of War Duties Also Applicable in Peace
The original thread with links to all audio / video recordings can be found here.
Remember Anons,
YOU ARE THE DIGITAL SOLDIERS
Enjoy, and GET DIGGING!
- Qanaut -
Pleasant voice.
Easy to listen to.
Thank you!
I thought it was a voice over program or smth. If not then Yes very pleasant voice
I used a neural synthesized voice for the project. I use my own voice extensively for the work I do by day, and as such I could never read the entire manual with consistent clarity or quality. I opted to use a synth voice for a consistent quality throughout the videos, even if that quality is less than what my voice can do at its best.
I welcome the feedback though. If you think the synth voice I chose is distracting, I can change the course of the videos. I chose what I consider to be the least distracting voice for the project, and one that I don't mind listening to for hours.
I actually quite like it. It’s not distracting.
Good to hear!
Could use UK Daniel and meme your way through.