I believe that they had to turn asshoe so we would all go do some research on our own and not rely on them. They helped when Geotus was running but had to let us all turn away from the usual propaganda and find info on our own. I am so thankful they did because WOW all the info we all found out about is truly astonishing. What could they possibly be holding back?????
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (13)
sorted by:
What's the first part of Divide and Conquer?
All news is controlled. All sides have always been controlled. The "right" has always been just as controlled as the "left".
The only way to rule the world is to control both sides of the conversation. That is the way it has always been. "Right" and "Left" were created in the beginning to control the world.
Does the "right" see more of the context (and thus more of the "truth") than the "left"? From my investigation the answer is, "mostly yes." On average the Conservatives see more of the context in any story, and thus get more of the truth. Sometimes it is the opposite, so don't think it is always that way on strictly one side. This is an average. Regardless however, the narrative is still controlled on both sides, and the division is driven from both sides.
Watch either side talk, and see how many times you hear, "The other side is lying" (or something to that effect).
News has always been: take a story, give one side a small piece and narrate over it to create one side. Take the same story, give the other side a larger piece of it and narrate to create the other side. One side gets more truth, but both get only a part of it. They then say, "the other side is lying."
Bam
Two sides; "the prison of two ideas" is created. The division is created, and the world is controlled from the shadows; because "we know who the enemy is. It's obviously the side that's lying."
FOX news has always been controlled opposition, just like all the rest of the "news" has been for all of time.
That doesn't mean there have been no honest reporters getting good stories out over time, but the overall narrative has been controlled on both sides, forever.
Correct.
And in my honest opinion, the ONLY MSM journalist that is willing to tell the truth is Herridge @ CBS. And even she only "reports" on select issues concerning D.C.
Like we've been saying for over 5 yrs now, "WE are the news, now."