Yeah, after reading the article, I came here to say the same thing.
Out of 270 pregnancies, "No outcome was provided for 238 pregnancies (note that 2 different outcomes were reported for each twin, and both were counted)."
That's quite a huge leap of supposition, making the title of this post (and the article) balderdash.
Not only that, I’ve seen a number of breathless posts here and elsewhere about incredibly high miscarriage rates… That are exactly the normal miscarriage rate. We really really really need to be careful. I always get shit for saying this, but it’s true. A lot of the people in the room just aren’t that intelligent. We run to post something or to share it on social media because boom boom boom look at this truth my God we’re going to show them this time…. And they actually have no idea what they’re talking about. The lack of discernment is disturbing to me. We just run with shit without any regard to skepticism, which is not a dirty word, we should embrace it, or old fashioned discernment.
I am going to go one step further.
This news site should be looked at with some skepticism from now on in, right? This is very bad journalism. Go look through their headlines, their articles, their archive. Do you notice anything? Sometimes, for sites like this I do notice something. There’s a lot of bad journalism. A lot of very iffy stories.
They make gateway pundit look decent. Maybe we think about it before posting another one of their articles here? I mean… We are the ones that value truth, right? It matters that we get things right. Right? Maybe we are a little slower to post stories and articles from sites that have routinely let us down? Just a thought.
Here is my take on vaccines and pregnancy. How can any scientist, doctor or researcher guarantee what will happen to the babies of vaccinated mothers? There was not enough time spent to determine anything. Did the baby walk on time? Did the baby have more childhood cancers? Did the baby have a normal iq? Was the baby developing normally? No one knows. There was not enough time.
You are on point Anon. Much of the media today is being done on the fly with no data backed answers. And the factual information is needed. The more it’s called out. The more people Awaken to the fiction being spread rather than the truth.
Just an anecdotal data point. One of our relatives who were trying for a child last year miscarried. Pretty sure fully vaccinated at that time. However no one can even mention vaccines in that conversation. Perhaps if there was a lot of discussion about this in public - hyperbole or not - they would be forced to pay more attention to individual cases and make clear determinations.
I always keep telling people. Our job is NOT to figure out the exact truth. Our job is to figure out when we are being lied to and scream it to everyone, so that it will force the truth to come out.
We are also competing with breathless screaming main stream propaganda. Its hard to compete with that if we always have to post very balanced, precisely worded social media posts.
What I am saying is, yes this particular post is old news, but the fact that NOT DATA has been provided regarding the other 238 after all these months is highly suspect, and this issue needs to be forced whatever way we can.
This is still old news.
Still no word on what happened to them. I really hope we can see the data for these 238 women.
Yeah, after reading the article, I came here to say the same thing.
Out of 270 pregnancies, "No outcome was provided for 238 pregnancies (note that 2 different outcomes were reported for each twin, and both were counted)."
That's quite a huge leap of supposition, making the title of this post (and the article) balderdash.
And the mods stickied this as well without looking into it
^This, this is about the laziest sticky I've seen so far.
Not only that, I’ve seen a number of breathless posts here and elsewhere about incredibly high miscarriage rates… That are exactly the normal miscarriage rate. We really really really need to be careful. I always get shit for saying this, but it’s true. A lot of the people in the room just aren’t that intelligent. We run to post something or to share it on social media because boom boom boom look at this truth my God we’re going to show them this time…. And they actually have no idea what they’re talking about. The lack of discernment is disturbing to me. We just run with shit without any regard to skepticism, which is not a dirty word, we should embrace it, or old fashioned discernment.
I am going to go one step further.
This news site should be looked at with some skepticism from now on in, right? This is very bad journalism. Go look through their headlines, their articles, their archive. Do you notice anything? Sometimes, for sites like this I do notice something. There’s a lot of bad journalism. A lot of very iffy stories.
They make gateway pundit look decent. Maybe we think about it before posting another one of their articles here? I mean… We are the ones that value truth, right? It matters that we get things right. Right? Maybe we are a little slower to post stories and articles from sites that have routinely let us down? Just a thought.
Here is my take on vaccines and pregnancy. How can any scientist, doctor or researcher guarantee what will happen to the babies of vaccinated mothers? There was not enough time spent to determine anything. Did the baby walk on time? Did the baby have more childhood cancers? Did the baby have a normal iq? Was the baby developing normally? No one knows. There was not enough time.
Thalidomide tells you all you need to know. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=thalidomide+babies&t=h_&ia=web
You are on point Anon. Much of the media today is being done on the fly with no data backed answers. And the factual information is needed. The more it’s called out. The more people Awaken to the fiction being spread rather than the truth.
Holy shit. Feel better about yourself now?
Everything from "The Daily Exposé" that I've looked into has been wrong.
Just an anecdotal data point. One of our relatives who were trying for a child last year miscarried. Pretty sure fully vaccinated at that time. However no one can even mention vaccines in that conversation. Perhaps if there was a lot of discussion about this in public - hyperbole or not - they would be forced to pay more attention to individual cases and make clear determinations.
I always keep telling people. Our job is NOT to figure out the exact truth. Our job is to figure out when we are being lied to and scream it to everyone, so that it will force the truth to come out.
We are also competing with breathless screaming main stream propaganda. Its hard to compete with that if we always have to post very balanced, precisely worded social media posts.
What I am saying is, yes this particular post is old news, but the fact that NOT DATA has been provided regarding the other 238 after all these months is highly suspect, and this issue needs to be forced whatever way we can.
No outcome reported means it ain't good.
The report Nd embellish any good news. This they just want us to forget.