3rd Booster Suggestion
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (93)
sorted by:
Has any researcher ever proven that and pubished a paper?
I doubt it.
Just making a statement that you THINK is true, is NOT "critical thinking."
What EVIDENCE do you have to support your thesis?
I dunno. Maybe one or more of the vaxx drugs has something in it that shows up as "positive" on a fake HIV test, but is otherwise meaningless.
That would be a GREAT way to control people, if you think it through.
It does not.
First off, you are talking about SARS-CoV-2 (the so-called "virus") and not Covid (the so-called illness caused by the so-called "virus").
We KNOW that there is no HIV genome in the SARS spike protein because the spike protein DOES NOT EXIST.
If the virus does not exist, then it cannot have a spike protein. If there is no spike protein, then it cannot have anything in it (HIV-related or otherwise).
Critical thinking.
Or as Q would say: Logical thinking (same thing).
It has not.
Again, you mean to say SARS-CoV-2, and no Covid.
But something that does not exist cannot mutate to something that does.
Logical thinking.
MAYBE that could happen. Has anyone ACTUALLY DONE ANY RESEARCH TO PROVE IT?
Nope.
ALL just rampant speculation.
Let's throw all that out, and get down to the BASICS:
LOGICAL THINKING.
Viruses do not exist (see the recent experiments of Stefan Lanka, and his associates, Tom Cowan and Andy Kaufmann).
Because we now KNOW that viruses AS A MATTER OF FACT ... DO NOT EXIST ... we can say that ALL of the speculative theories about SARS-CoV-2 are ... ALL WRONG.
Nature has a systematic review regarding all of ivermectin’s antiviral effects.
This is from June 2020, after Montagnier came under fire for saying IVM and HCQ would stop proliferation.
I’m not responding to the rest of your comment because you’re clearly unfamiliar with the literature and unwilling to consider evidence in opposition to your already formed opinion.