Research on what? Unicorns? There's no way to do research on what does not exist. You need to provide evidence to prove it to yourself. Otherwise, you are just getting caught up in an urban myth...going along to be One of the Guys. The Cool Dude who is "into" the sinister doings. I've seen the portentious videos of speculators who know nothing about atmospheric phenomena and are just convinced that their gut instinct is better than actual scientific knowledge. Do you call that evidence? I call it nonsense.
Just remember. Evidence is of what is, not of what one suspects. It does not rest on interpretation, but on facts that lead to only one conclusion. Calling a contrail a "chemtrail" is like calling a zebra a unicorn.
I'm the guy with the knowledge: 40 years in aerospace engineering of advanced systems, at a company that builds jetliners. Yeah, you have to prove yourself, because you don't know anything.
Lots of information, fine. So what? There is even talk of how to recondition planets to be more like Earth (or otherwise). Even a topic of science fiction movies. But it is all talk. No implementation. HAARP is only an experiment. Chemtrails are urban myth. Speculation is not fact.
As for contrails, you are the one who is no expert. I have seen jet contrails since I was a child out in the back yard, sitting among the dandelions. I have lived under the approach/departure corridor of an international airport for the past 40 years. I have the appropriate degrees and professional experience. There are no "small, marginal" atmospheric conditions. It is purely a matter of altitude, pressure, and temperature. ANY engine, piston or jet, will leave condensation trails at higher altitude---they exhaust water vapor as a combustion product. It condenses from the cold environment. They "act" exactly as we see, because that is what they are. You are a fool to think they are something rare. (If the air is warmer or below saturation density, the vapor will not condense. This is why the phenomenon is dependent on weather conditions.) That is all there is to it. I've seen them extend from one end of the sky to the other.
The reason you have to point me to a video is because you don't understand the argument. And you believe the video because you don't understand the argument. You don't even know why I should see the video. What is the key insight? I saw a hoax video one time that purported to show an airplane equipped for chemtrailing. It was bogus, just a pirated video of Boeing test aircraft ballast manipulation. I saw another video by a guy all impressed with himself and amazed at contrails. It's like trying to get sense out of a guy who never saw grass and insisted it was unusual. With videos like this nonsense, what do you expect me to think? That it's not nonsense? That's why the onus is on you. You can sink into your paranoid fantasies, or try to touch reality.
What are your credentials for saying anything? I presented mine: 3 degrees in aeronautics & astronautics, 40 years in aerospace engineering at Boeing, and participation in top level program management reviews for commercial airplanes. I've seen these aircraft in states of assembly (no chemtrail equipment). I was also part of a research team that was trying to solve the problem of detecting clear-air turbulence (wake downdrafts) in a useful format. I actually suggested using ammonia as a marking agent (chemtrail) for wake detection, but it was too problematic. Because you have nothing specific to allege, I deduce that you have no education or experience in this field and are speaking mainly from videos you have viewed or websites you have read.
The science is under my belt. It is simple condensation of water vapor. Contrails are clouds. There is a vast variety among clouds, in case you haven't noticed. Observation is science, in case you are not aware.
Science would indeed be the detection of the physical evidence. I have outlined what it would take. So, get busy. You haven't any evidence. All you have is speculation and paranoia. There are no chemtrails. And while there may be lies about various things, there are no lies about chemtrails. The rest of us are awake. You are languishing in a self-inflicted nightmare. You talk about proving things with science, but you are simply ignorant. You don't like being called ignorant?---show that you know something.
Research on what? Unicorns? There's no way to do research on what does not exist. You need to provide evidence to prove it to yourself. Otherwise, you are just getting caught up in an urban myth...going along to be One of the Guys. The Cool Dude who is "into" the sinister doings. I've seen the portentious videos of speculators who know nothing about atmospheric phenomena and are just convinced that their gut instinct is better than actual scientific knowledge. Do you call that evidence? I call it nonsense.
Just remember. Evidence is of what is, not of what one suspects. It does not rest on interpretation, but on facts that lead to only one conclusion. Calling a contrail a "chemtrail" is like calling a zebra a unicorn.
I'm the guy with the knowledge: 40 years in aerospace engineering of advanced systems, at a company that builds jetliners. Yeah, you have to prove yourself, because you don't know anything.
Lots of information, fine. So what? There is even talk of how to recondition planets to be more like Earth (or otherwise). Even a topic of science fiction movies. But it is all talk. No implementation. HAARP is only an experiment. Chemtrails are urban myth. Speculation is not fact.
As for contrails, you are the one who is no expert. I have seen jet contrails since I was a child out in the back yard, sitting among the dandelions. I have lived under the approach/departure corridor of an international airport for the past 40 years. I have the appropriate degrees and professional experience. There are no "small, marginal" atmospheric conditions. It is purely a matter of altitude, pressure, and temperature. ANY engine, piston or jet, will leave condensation trails at higher altitude---they exhaust water vapor as a combustion product. It condenses from the cold environment. They "act" exactly as we see, because that is what they are. You are a fool to think they are something rare. (If the air is warmer or below saturation density, the vapor will not condense. This is why the phenomenon is dependent on weather conditions.) That is all there is to it. I've seen them extend from one end of the sky to the other.
The reason you have to point me to a video is because you don't understand the argument. And you believe the video because you don't understand the argument. You don't even know why I should see the video. What is the key insight? I saw a hoax video one time that purported to show an airplane equipped for chemtrailing. It was bogus, just a pirated video of Boeing test aircraft ballast manipulation. I saw another video by a guy all impressed with himself and amazed at contrails. It's like trying to get sense out of a guy who never saw grass and insisted it was unusual. With videos like this nonsense, what do you expect me to think? That it's not nonsense? That's why the onus is on you. You can sink into your paranoid fantasies, or try to touch reality.
What are your credentials for saying anything? I presented mine: 3 degrees in aeronautics & astronautics, 40 years in aerospace engineering at Boeing, and participation in top level program management reviews for commercial airplanes. I've seen these aircraft in states of assembly (no chemtrail equipment). I was also part of a research team that was trying to solve the problem of detecting clear-air turbulence (wake downdrafts) in a useful format. I actually suggested using ammonia as a marking agent (chemtrail) for wake detection, but it was too problematic. Because you have nothing specific to allege, I deduce that you have no education or experience in this field and are speaking mainly from videos you have viewed or websites you have read.
The science is under my belt. It is simple condensation of water vapor. Contrails are clouds. There is a vast variety among clouds, in case you haven't noticed. Observation is science, in case you are not aware.
Science would indeed be the detection of the physical evidence. I have outlined what it would take. So, get busy. You haven't any evidence. All you have is speculation and paranoia. There are no chemtrails. And while there may be lies about various things, there are no lies about chemtrails. The rest of us are awake. You are languishing in a self-inflicted nightmare. You talk about proving things with science, but you are simply ignorant. You don't like being called ignorant?---show that you know something.