I still don't understand why they cannot force the government to file charges or release them.
The head judge is corrupt, and will not allow it to happen.
And BTW ... ALL federal courts are overseen by ONE of the justices on the US Supreme Court. It is supposed to be a check and balance on corruption within the court system. Guess which justice oversees the DC courts?
Roberts.
If the head judge in DC is trampling on the constitutional rights of the political prisoners (and he is), then Roberts is ultimately at fault -- just like he is at fault for what happens at the FISA court, which he also oversees.
I’m pretty sure there’s a lot more to WHY they’re being held… it needs some thorough digging. I’m going to go with the assumption ( can make an ass out of me) that it is buried in a statute or bill. Educated guess… the redefinition of terrorism. After 9/11, it became acceptable to spy on on our citizens and more. Today, anyone who disagrees with the narrative or perpetuates “misinformation”, whether it be at a school board meeting, podcast, or peer reviewed study is now considered a terrorist. Holding them without charging them, goes against the essence of our constitution. It doesn’t make sense. But what does in clown world?
Very interesting. Perhaps the real reason for the J6 is to expose how since 9/11 all these fundamental rights have been eroded so we can undo the patriot bill, the surveillance state and a million other things they have done to us.
Or call public attention to it without blowing their brains as to what has slowly and intentionally has been allowed to happen while we all weren’t paying attention (especially after 9/11). The legal aspect of all of this has made people dig into how our government works… the branches, circuits,mandates, state v federal… it raises questions like the impact of congressional (among other) sovereign immunities all the way down to the impact of a local school board elections. It’s a crash course. To what it takes to be a citizen of the greatest nation.
One of my defining moments was trying to understand why Trump published the 1776 report just a few days before he “left office” only for it to be removed days later. Today, I understand.
If they are still in prison they've been charged. Duck duck go for January 6th sentences or charges. There's a large number of those people who are still in prison because they've been found guilty and are actually serving their sentences. They aren't being held without charge or anything like that.
lol, you sound verbatim like the Politico factcheck. There is a lot of fog of war but I am not convinced that everyone got due process and had their bails set according to what they would be eventually charged, and that no one was coerced into pleading guilty of something lesser due to the horrific conditions (a standard tactic by DAs to ensure they are not sued for wrongful arrest)
I still don't understand why they cannot force the government to file charges or release them. All the TV shows seem to indicate thats how it works.
The lack of information regarding these people and even their charges is abhorrent.
Is it even real? Fog of war is heavy.
Unknown. The FROG of war is heavy you mean! The secrets are not getting out on Pepe's side.
I feel like this could be turned into a great meme!
The head judge is corrupt, and will not allow it to happen.
And BTW ... ALL federal courts are overseen by ONE of the justices on the US Supreme Court. It is supposed to be a check and balance on corruption within the court system. Guess which justice oversees the DC courts?
Roberts.
If the head judge in DC is trampling on the constitutional rights of the political prisoners (and he is), then Roberts is ultimately at fault -- just like he is at fault for what happens at the FISA court, which he also oversees.
I agree, bc the Bill of Rights gives them the right to a speedy trial.
I’m pretty sure there’s a lot more to WHY they’re being held… it needs some thorough digging. I’m going to go with the assumption ( can make an ass out of me) that it is buried in a statute or bill. Educated guess… the redefinition of terrorism. After 9/11, it became acceptable to spy on on our citizens and more. Today, anyone who disagrees with the narrative or perpetuates “misinformation”, whether it be at a school board meeting, podcast, or peer reviewed study is now considered a terrorist. Holding them without charging them, goes against the essence of our constitution. It doesn’t make sense. But what does in clown world?
Very interesting. Perhaps the real reason for the J6 is to expose how since 9/11 all these fundamental rights have been eroded so we can undo the patriot bill, the surveillance state and a million other things they have done to us.
Or call public attention to it without blowing their brains as to what has slowly and intentionally has been allowed to happen while we all weren’t paying attention (especially after 9/11). The legal aspect of all of this has made people dig into how our government works… the branches, circuits,mandates, state v federal… it raises questions like the impact of congressional (among other) sovereign immunities all the way down to the impact of a local school board elections. It’s a crash course. To what it takes to be a citizen of the greatest nation.
One of my defining moments was trying to understand why Trump published the 1776 report just a few days before he “left office” only for it to be removed days later. Today, I understand.
https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/The-Presidents-Advisory-1776-Commission-Final-Report.pdf
If they are still in prison they've been charged. Duck duck go for January 6th sentences or charges. There's a large number of those people who are still in prison because they've been found guilty and are actually serving their sentences. They aren't being held without charge or anything like that.
lol, you sound verbatim like the Politico factcheck. There is a lot of fog of war but I am not convinced that everyone got due process and had their bails set according to what they would be eventually charged, and that no one was coerced into pleading guilty of something lesser due to the horrific conditions (a standard tactic by DAs to ensure they are not sued for wrongful arrest)