Let’s accelerate that process. Humanity awakening from its enslavement to allopathic medicine in a faster manner will shift the timeline forward such that we skip a lot of pain and suffering.
Indeed, the Global Cult agenda depends on this process being slowed as much as possible (since it is the nature of timeline dynamics that the awakening does occur; it’s not a matter of if; it’s when). The Global Cult is banking on keeping people brainwashed and thus easy to control and manipulate.
Spread this document. May not open in brave:
https://u1lib.org/book/17573423/2c377f
And then this:
https://book4you.org/book/5418297/958a07 What Really Makes You Ill?: Why Everything You Thought You Knew About Disease Is Wrong Dawn Lester, David Parker
I am happy to answer any questions.
Why do bio warfare labs spend money researching viruses?
Maybe the same reason NASA spent billions to pretend to go to the moon. Now they're preparing to pretend to go to Mars and they need more money. Every dollar spent/taken goes on our collective credit card.
I'm with you on the NASA moon mission and I'm sure there is a lot of grift in bio weapons research as well but I don't see a viable replacement theory for contagious viruses.
This requires research and I suggest you start by reading the short pdf I linked and then you will want to know more and can read the longer book.
look into Bechamp
I had a tough time with it too. I really recommend the Dr. Sam Bailey videos.
Because toxins and poisons exist. Those are not viruses. See for example the aluminum and formaldehyde they put in all injections including the ones given to infants, the metals the spray the sky with, the fluoride in water, etc.
What are the contagious diseases which are currently attributed to viruses?
Well obviously a lot - many are the exercise to inject infants with formaldehyde and aluminum, two extreme toxins that exist in all injections which is no “conspiracy theory” - the Pharma companies don’t deny this. They deny they no longer contain mercury, but when pressed further they admit they still contain mercury, just not in “harmful amounts”.
The great thing about the longer book I linked is that it goes through each of these “contagious diseases” and explains them.
So are you saying that formaldehyde and aluminium are contagious? That doesn't make sense.
There is contagion, yes? When one child in a class get a stomach bug or a cold and passes is around. How does this happen without viruses?
I've followed the "toxin" theory in vaccines for 20 years. I've come to think that the REAL DAMAGE is done by all the foreign animal and human products mixed in that our bodies VIOLENTLY REJECT.
I have no facts to back up my theory, but I've been leaning in this direction for the past 2-3 years.
They're making poisons which become components in vaccines. Simple
They are certainly doing that, although I argue that they use viruses as a part of that process.
Okay. You'll have to prove "viruses" exist for starters then. This is the crux of the arguments made by Dr. Stefan Lanka, Dr. Andrew Kaufman, Dr. Tom Cowan and Dr. Sam Bailey.
They have all definitively demonstrated that there's no proof of the existence of "viruses" by deconstructing all the scientific medical papers claiming otherwise. These good doctors aren't "making a claim" themselves. They're REFUTING the claim of establishment allophathic (Rockefellerian) medicine.
Viruses were theoretical up until the late 1930s after the appearance of the electron microscope. In the 1940s they looked for them but couldn't really find them. So in 1954, a laboratory expert (Jon Enders) invented a new technique alleged to be able to "find viruses". He did this for measles. In his experiments, he actually ran a control experiment (which virologists never did again) where he left out the so-called "Infected fluids" of a sick person and concluded that the results of his novel "viral culturing" method were INDISTINGUISHABLE from the control experiment. Astonishingly, everybody appears to have just ignored that sentence.
This is how Stefan Lanka was able to challenge the world to produce a paper that scientifically demonstrates the existence of viruses offering a 100,000 Euro prize. One clown tried to collect on it and ultimately failed. Lanka kept his money, because viruses are nothing more than a fairy-tale.
Well, I believe in a contagious agent for things like the cold, let's call hat a "virus" for argument's sake if it isn't a bacterium or fungus etc.
There are lots of things which can't be seen, like individual molecules and atoms. They exist in that they are a good working model for chemistry even though they are too small to handle. That's how I see viruses.
I believe that viruses as an infectious agent must be self replicating within the host or they would not propagate because the numbers would reduce by attrition. in this way, they are like other parasites such as parasitic worms, insects, fungi, bacteria.
So here I'm defining virus as the parasite which self replicates and transmits colds and other "viral" diseases. Such a thing exists yes? or there would have to be a better explanation for contagion in these cases. I'm saying nothing about it's nature at this point.
If medical tests can distinguish cells of infected people from uninfected people which have extra code in then I would make the assumption that the code is from this parasite.
For me, the concept of a virus is the placeholder for infectious disease by a miniature (much smaller than a cell) self replicating parasite that is the cause of a disease like the common cold or smallpox. Can you tell me that such a thing does not exist or are we just arguing about it's precise nature?