Let’s accelerate that process. Humanity awakening from its enslavement to allopathic medicine in a faster manner will shift the timeline forward such that we skip a lot of pain and suffering.
Indeed, the Global Cult agenda depends on this process being slowed as much as possible (since it is the nature of timeline dynamics that the awakening does occur; it’s not a matter of if; it’s when). The Global Cult is banking on keeping people brainwashed and thus easy to control and manipulate.
Spread this document. May not open in brave:
https://u1lib.org/book/17573423/2c377f
And then this:
https://book4you.org/book/5418297/958a07 What Really Makes You Ill?: Why Everything You Thought You Knew About Disease Is Wrong Dawn Lester, David Parker
I am happy to answer any questions.
Okay. You'll have to prove "viruses" exist for starters then. This is the crux of the arguments made by Dr. Stefan Lanka, Dr. Andrew Kaufman, Dr. Tom Cowan and Dr. Sam Bailey.
They have all definitively demonstrated that there's no proof of the existence of "viruses" by deconstructing all the scientific medical papers claiming otherwise. These good doctors aren't "making a claim" themselves. They're REFUTING the claim of establishment allophathic (Rockefellerian) medicine.
Viruses were theoretical up until the late 1930s after the appearance of the electron microscope. In the 1940s they looked for them but couldn't really find them. So in 1954, a laboratory expert (Jon Enders) invented a new technique alleged to be able to "find viruses". He did this for measles. In his experiments, he actually ran a control experiment (which virologists never did again) where he left out the so-called "Infected fluids" of a sick person and concluded that the results of his novel "viral culturing" method were INDISTINGUISHABLE from the control experiment. Astonishingly, everybody appears to have just ignored that sentence.
This is how Stefan Lanka was able to challenge the world to produce a paper that scientifically demonstrates the existence of viruses offering a 100,000 Euro prize. One clown tried to collect on it and ultimately failed. Lanka kept his money, because viruses are nothing more than a fairy-tale.
Well, I believe in a contagious agent for things like the cold, let's call hat a "virus" for argument's sake if it isn't a bacterium or fungus etc.
There are lots of things which can't be seen, like individual molecules and atoms. They exist in that they are a good working model for chemistry even though they are too small to handle. That's how I see viruses.
I believe that viruses as an infectious agent must be self replicating within the host or they would not propagate because the numbers would reduce by attrition. in this way, they are like other parasites such as parasitic worms, insects, fungi, bacteria.
So here I'm defining virus as the parasite which self replicates and transmits colds and other "viral" diseases. Such a thing exists yes? or there would have to be a better explanation for contagion in these cases. I'm saying nothing about it's nature at this point.
If medical tests can distinguish cells of infected people from uninfected people which have extra code in then I would make the assumption that the code is from this parasite.
For me, the concept of a virus is the placeholder for infectious disease by a miniature (much smaller than a cell) self replicating parasite that is the cause of a disease like the common cold or smallpox. Can you tell me that such a thing does not exist or are we just arguing about it's precise nature?
Point 1: Bacteriophages and Exosomes can all be seen under the microscope and are of the same nano-scale size as so-called "viruses". Seeing them is not a "technical" issue.
Point 2: Electonrs/Protons/Neutrons are also a lie, but that's a chat for another day
Point 3: "Infectious agents" is just an "idea", as so called "Pathogens" or "Contagions". No such "agent" exists. Bacteria aren't "infectious/contagious", nor are fungi (or parasites for that matter). Bacteria repair/rebuild/remove necrotic tissues --- bacteria are not the CAUSE of necrotic tissue.
Point 4: There's no such thing as "self-replication", especially by any so-called chunk of dead RNA/DNA (which is also a lie). It's all a fairy-tale of grand proportion designed to strike fear into the hearts and minds of humanity. No such "self-replication" has ever been demonstrated. All scientific papers stating such are nothing but childish experiments where they inject toxic foreign substances into helpless mice and guinea pigs.
Point 5: Colds/Flus aren't "transmitted" by anything MATERIAL in nature. No such evidence has ever been demonstrated. We've found, after heavy deep-dive searching about a dozen experiments attempting to demonstrate human-to-human transmission of dis-ease (allegedly via either virus or bacteria) and all failed miserably. The reason they're hard to find is because they don't support the dominant narrative. I hesitate to explain what the REAL "agent of transmission" is, because until people realize the big "Contagion myth", their minds simply aren't ready for the actual explanation. This has been my experience virtually 100% of the time.
Point 6: Parasites are not contagious/infectious/pathogenic either. Parasites are symbiotic organisms that feed on toxic waste stored in a body that is overly toxic due to poor life habits.
Point 7: No, "viruses" do not exist. Doctors Lanka, Kaufman, Cowan and Bailey have been demonstrating for well over a year this very fact.
Point 8: The only thing scientists ever "find" in a sick person is the evidence of cellular damage, which indicate the presence of the so-called "antibodies", which are nothing more than globulins that act as cellular glue to keep decaying tissue in tact. There are no such thing as specific "antibodies" for certain dis-eases. See Dr. Lanka's paper on the subject. https://truthseeker.se/wp-content/uploads/Stefan-Lanka-The-Misinterpretation-of-the-Antibodies-English-Translation.pdf (Dr. Lanka on antibodies)
Point 9: Contagion/Pathogenicity/Infectious agents are a lie, beginning to end. Hopefully the above comments demonstrate this. Viruses don't exist but could be "seen" if they did. Bacteria/Fungi/Parasites are not infectious. All assist the body to return to homeostasis in their particular ways.
Point 10: The story of "Small pox" is truly all about poisons - air, water supplies, food and of course, the most poisonous of all, vaccines. See my other comment in this thread about it. "Colds" are largely a re-balancing event, typically brought on by lack of connection to nature, sun, fresh air, which all work to keep our electrical body in harmony and balance. When we lose our connection to the natural world, we get sick in a variety of ways. "Colds" are the mildest form of said "sickness".
A bacteriophage is a virus as I understand it. It's the version of a virus that affects bacteria. It's going to be the same order of scale as a virus.
I see electrons / protons as a model for chemistry, I don't suppose they exist as objects. Maybe they could be thought of as waves or charge density distributions. i don't know. Anyway, as a useful model they exist. You can count how many electrons there are on a carbon atom and how "heavy" a proton is. it depends on how you define "exist".
Yes, infectious agents is just an idea, but it's the best we have to explain contagion, which exists. how else could a disease be transmitted.
Why should a bacterium or a fungus repair us when they can attack us instead. What would the bacterium gain? THere are cases where there is a gain for each entity, like symbiosis of bacteria in the gut, but most will be opportunistic jsut in teh same way as animals eat each other. Imagining bacteria don't attack us is the same as saying animals don't attack each other. It's in their interest to attack us. Parasitism exists because it suits the parasite.
5 .
If I'm going to stop believing in parasites and infectious disease, you'd better tell me now what the better explanation is, and it had better be good because right now you are wasting my time.
Why should a parasite restrict itself to being helpful and not plunder the host body for resourses. Yes I agree parasite infections will be worse in unfit people and there may be certain benefits in special circumstances, but in the main, parasites are out for themselves and have no duty to keep people healthy or to punish an unhealthy lifestyle, they are just out for themselves.
i can't see how anyone can demonstrate that viruses don't exist.
of course you can find parasites or bacteria in sick animals. i mean liver flukes, worms, MRSA, chiggers, bots, lice, whatever. There are specific and non specific antibodies which help a body fight of the next infection. That's why people become more immune.
Argh! parasites are there to help? nonsense!
10 you have a lot of magical thinking. Colds are there to rebalance? makes no sense I guess all injuries are there to rebalance too by that kind of thinking, because we heal.
I am not at all convinced. You seem to see the microbiotic world as there to help and rebalance humans. That's a really anthropocentric view. Isn't it more likely that we are not the centre of the universe and that microbiotic life is just out for itself, fighting us for space and resources?
This is just a sneaky way to maintain the virus fairytale. Why can't a bacteriophage just be a bacteriophage, the end?
Agreed
"Contagious agents" is far from the "best" way to explain things. But it's an absolute NECESSITY if you're a materialist, which is the dominant narrative (which is a massive lie). Bacteria and Fungi both arise from the REAL BASIS of all life, which is not the "cell". It is the Microzyma/Protid/Bion/Somatid (BeChamp/Enderlein/Reich/Nassens) all named differently by all these scientists. This Microzyma is the indestructible BASIS of all life, which morphs into our "cells" as well as morphing into all bacteria and fungi. Thus, cells, bacteria, fungi are all TEMPORARY "forms" of the microzyma, which itself cannot be destroyed - the "God Particle" was found long ago. This activity is called either "Pleimorphism" or "Polymorphism" which has been MASSIVELY suppressed by the establishment institutions. And yet, it was first seen and described, quite clearly in the 1870s by BeChamp - Louis "the liar" Pasteurs unknown nemesis, who was right about everything at the same time Pasteur was literally wrong about everything. And who is today's rockstar?
In what other way can I say it's all a lie? The "spike protein" is literally the onset of cellular destruction. The "spikes" are the visualization of the cell beginning to die. There is LITERALLY NO-THING else "there" but the "Cell" itself. "The vax" is nothing but poison that causes cellular damage and destruction (the toxic batches anyway, not the saline placebos).
Well then hang on to the lies then. There are a kajillion different so-called "dis-eases". The fundamental problem lies in the way we've all been TAUGHT TO THINK. Until you're ready to perceive "reality" in a different way, you'll violently reject the actual explanation. It's a 180-degree shift from "victim consciousness" to crystal clear self-awareness. The vast majority aren't ready for this....yet. The masses are fully and completely brainwashed into the former, which is how the cabal gets away with what it gets away with in the first place.
Simple. Parasites eat toxic waste. This is their only food supply. They are TREMENDOUSLY symbiotic with living organisms. But if the body is too toxic, not even they can help maintain life.
You've got things backwards my friend. The question to ask is, has anybody ever demonstrated that they DO exist - with provable, repeatable experiments using the scientific method? If I make the claim that the moon is made of blue cheese, is the burden of proof now on you to prove I'm wrong?
Read the paper from Stefan Lanka and think it through a bit. Are you really walking around with dormant antibodies for umpteen different unicorn viruses and bacteria, just lying there somewhere in your lymph nodes or who-knows-where, just waiting to spring into action when your body gets "ATTACKED"? Once again, you're going to have a problem PROVING this, because there's no such proof of this - anywhere in the medical literature. It's yet another fairy tale that fully engenders fear and victim consciousness - the PRIMARY tools of the cabal!
If there are no toxins present, they just pass right through our systems. Very, very simple. That's why most of us who are healthy don't "have parasites". Considering they're EVERYWHERE!!! It's the same nonsense with germ theory. There should be MASSIVE localized "parasitical outbreaks" in a community if they are really ATTACKING anyone and everyone indiscriminately, right?
Colds are detoxing/rebalancing an electrically disconnected, unabalanced body. As mentioned above, we will need to change the way we think --- ENTIRELY --- to come to terms with what "dis-ease" actually is. It's a paradigm shift of epic proportions. And one you're obviously not prepared to entertain just yet if you believe we are victims of germs, pathogens, contagions, carcinogens, metastasis, etc., then you believe in the cabal-curated world of "victim consciousness". And this is precisely the problem we're up against - lifetimes after lifetimes of brainwashing. It can't all unwind at once with mega short-circuiting. The vast majority of dis-ease, not caused by poisons or malnutrition (which are rare), is a return to homeostasis. We've been taught to THINK of dis-ease precisely BACKWARDS. I'll leave it at that.
Watch this video. Kind of a normie-level summary of the findings of Lanka, Kaufman, Cowan and Bailey. Tom red-pills Lee Merrit, doctor and former-believer (we all were) in "viruses".
https://www.bitchute.com/video/rloCSmKl8b4l/
Please go get bit by a bunch of ticks and get infected with Borrelia, Babesia, and Bartonella and report back. I can't wait to see how you handle it.
I'll do so right after you produce the scientific paper demonstrating this is what happens -> Tick has said bacteria in mouth -> tick bites person -> bacteria spread into bite victims blood -> resulting in dis-ease.
Thousands of us have been looking for such a scientific paper for the better part of two years now.
Although, I've never heard of any of these things. Are those the names of dis-eases or so-called bacteria?