A bacteriophage is a virus as I understand it. It's the version of a virus that affects bacteria. It's going to be the same order of scale as a virus.

This is just a sneaky way to maintain the virus fairytale. Why can't a bacteriophage just be a bacteriophage, the end?

I see electrons / protons as a model for chemistry, I don't suppose they exist as objects. Maybe they could be thought of as waves or charge density distributions. i don't know. Anyway, as a useful model they exist. You can count how many electrons there are on a carbon atom and how "heavy" a proton is. it depends on how you define "exist".

Agreed

Yes, infectious agents is just an idea, but it's the best we have to explain contagion, which exists. how else could a disease be transmitted. Why should a bacterium or a fungus repair us when they can attack us instead. What would the bacterium gain? THere are cases where there is a gain for each entity, like symbiosis of bacteria in the gut, but most will be opportunistic jsut in teh same way as animals eat each other. Imagining bacteria don't attack us is the same as saying animals don't attack each other. It's in their interest to attack us. Parasitism exists because it suits the parasite.

"Contagious agents" is far from the "best" way to explain things. But it's an absolute NECESSITY if you're a materialist, which is the dominant narrative (which is a massive lie). Bacteria and Fungi both arise from the REAL BASIS of all life, which is not the "cell". It is the Microzyma/Protid/Bion/Somatid (BeChamp/Enderlein/Reich/Nassens) all named differently by all these scientists. This Microzyma is the indestructible BASIS of all life, which morphs into our "cells" as well as morphing into all bacteria and fungi. Thus, cells, bacteria, fungi are all TEMPORARY "forms" of the microzyma, which itself cannot be destroyed - the "God Particle" was found long ago. This activity is called either "Pleimorphism" or "Polymorphism" which has been MASSIVELY suppressed by the establishment institutions. And yet, it was first seen and described, quite clearly in the 1870s by BeChamp - Louis "the liar" Pasteurs unknown nemesis, who was right about everything at the same time Pasteur was literally wrong about everything. And who is today's rockstar?

Yes, viral replication using host cell material has been demonstrated. That is fact the same mechanism the vax uses to make spike proteins. it's there right in front of you. Virus makes cell make virus, Vax makes cell make viral parts, or if you prefer, vax makes cell produce many copies of toxic protein using cell's own machinery.

In what other way can I say it's all a lie? The "spike protein" is literally the onset of cellular destruction. The "spikes" are the visualization of the cell beginning to die. There is LITERALLY NO-THING else "there" but the "Cell" itself. "The vax" is nothing but poison that causes cellular damage and destruction (the toxic batches anyway, not the saline placebos).

If I'm going to stop believing in parasites and infectious disease, you'd better tell me now what the better explanation is, and it had better be good because right now you are wasting my time.

Well then hang on to the lies then. There are a kajillion different so-called "dis-eases". The fundamental problem lies in the way we've all been TAUGHT TO THINK. Until you're ready to perceive "reality" in a different way, you'll violently reject the actual explanation. It's a 180-degree shift from "victim consciousness" to crystal clear self-awareness. The vast majority aren't ready for this....yet. The masses are fully and completely brainwashed into the former, which is how the cabal gets away with what it gets away with in the first place.

Why should a parasite restrict itself to being helpful and not plunder the host body for resourses. Yes I agree parasite infections will be worse in unfit people and there may be certain benefits in special circumstances, but in the main, parasites are out for themselves and have no duty to keep people healthy or to punish an unhealthy lifestyle, they are just out for themselves.

Simple. Parasites eat toxic waste. This is their only food supply. They are TREMENDOUSLY symbiotic with living organisms. But if the body is too toxic, not even they can help maintain life.

i can't see how anyone can demonstrate that viruses don't exist.

You've got things backwards my friend. The question to ask is, has anybody ever demonstrated that they DO exist - with provable, repeatable experiments using the scientific method? If I make the claim that the moon is made of blue cheese, is the burden of proof now on you to prove I'm wrong?

of course you can find parasites or bacteria in sick animals. i mean liver flukes, worms, MRSA, chiggers, bots, lice, whatever. There are specific and non specific antibodies which help a body fight of the next infection. That's why people become more immune.

Read the paper from Stefan Lanka and think it through a bit. Are you really walking around with dormant antibodies for umpteen different unicorn viruses and bacteria, just lying there somewhere in your lymph nodes or who-knows-where, just waiting to spring into action when your body gets "ATTACKED"? Once again, you're going to have a problem PROVING this, because there's no such proof of this - anywhere in the medical literature. It's yet another fairy tale that fully engenders fear and victim consciousness - the PRIMARY tools of the cabal!

Argh! parasites are there to help? nonsense!

If there are no toxins present, they just pass right through our systems. Very, very simple. That's why most of us who are healthy don't "have parasites". Considering they're EVERYWHERE!!! It's the same nonsense with germ theory. There should be MASSIVE localized "parasitical outbreaks" in a community if they are really ATTACKING anyone and everyone indiscriminately, right?

10 you have a lot of magical thinking. Colds are there to rebalance? makes no sense I guess all injuries are there to rebalance too by that kind of thinking, because we heal.

Colds are detoxing/rebalancing an electrically disconnected, unabalanced body. As mentioned above, we will need to change the way we think --- ENTIRELY --- to come to terms with what "dis-ease" actually is. It's a paradigm shift of epic proportions. And one you're obviously not prepared to entertain just yet if you believe we are victims of germs, pathogens, contagions, carcinogens, metastasis, etc., then you believe in the cabal-curated world of "victim consciousness". And this is precisely the problem we're up against - lifetimes after lifetimes of brainwashing. It can't all unwind at once with mega short-circuiting. The vast majority of dis-ease, not caused by poisons or malnutrition (which are rare), is a return to homeostasis. We've been taught to THINK of dis-ease precisely BACKWARDS. I'll leave it at that.

Watch this video. Kind of a normie-level summary of the findings of Lanka, Kaufman, Cowan and Bailey. Tom red-pills Lee Merrit, doctor and former-believer (we all were) in "viruses".

https://www.bitchute.com/video/rloCSmKl8b4l/