It's not an 'either' 'or' situation. Try to rationalize all of this. Are all the 'Q' posts from White hats? Could the 'Black hats' tried to muck up the 'Q' COMMS? Is it possible some of the 'Q' posts were not from White hats? Didn't 'Q' state that some COMMS that are posted are DISINFO?
Not everything is black and white. In warfare, there's always shade of gray too.
I believe this is one reason why people are befuddled at interpreting the 'Q' posts. Did it ever occur to anyone that the platform was the terrain in which cyber warfare was being waged? The COMMS were not for us. We were the terrain. Did 'Q' post things for us? Yes. These posts were clear and direct -- Have hope. Solidarity. Pray. Showing Proofs. Be peaceful. Patriotic. Be patient. WWG1WGA.
So its either Q was a giant troll or the idea that it was the cia misinfo was a troll. Seen too many proofs to think Q was a toll
It's not an 'either' 'or' situation. Try to rationalize all of this. Are all the 'Q' posts from White hats? Could the 'Black hats' tried to muck up the 'Q' COMMS? Is it possible some of the 'Q' posts were not from White hats? Didn't 'Q' state that some COMMS that are posted are DISINFO?
Not everything is black and white. In warfare, there's always shade of gray too.
I believe this is one reason why people are befuddled at interpreting the 'Q' posts. Did it ever occur to anyone that the platform was the terrain in which cyber warfare was being waged? The COMMS were not for us. We were the terrain. Did 'Q' post things for us? Yes. These posts were clear and direct -- Have hope. Solidarity. Pray. Showing Proofs. Be peaceful. Patriotic. Be patient. WWG1WGA.
Smart thinking. Here's the lowdown on Jack:
https://greatawakening.win/p/12igmLfX4p/top-10-reasons-why-you-should-st/