I'm as big a dog lover as any. I also have kids. Dogs ain't children. Attachment doesnt make them so. They are a pet. Don't care about the emotion. It's a pet.
I know dogs are not children. My parents had 2 children but the 2 dogs they have they love just like they are their kids now that we are out of the house. Those dogs are devoted to just as they would devote themselves to a child. I have 4 children. My children are my everything. So I know the difference between the two. Sorry didn't mean to cause offense from my comment
Did you intend to say, "Dogs are treated as children by some people?" Biologically, this statement doesn't fly. But I agree that it is pure evil, especially when the truckers are only standing up for the right to choose whether a non-vaccine (it does not protect against 'catching the disease' , and likely doesn't lessen symptoms either) can be forced on them. The threats to claim "Child endangerment" are a greater evil, and will be greater still if the brownshirts follow through.
Did you intend to say, "Dogs are treated as children by some people?" Biologically, this statement doesn't fly.
What statement? "Dogs are treated as children by some people?" That is merely a description of objective, observable reality rather than a biological statement; so it can't biologically fly or not fly IMO.
The propaganda that would concern me most is them impounding my dog, then killing it after 8 days.
That is just pure evil. Dogs are some people's children and I can see Trudeau smiling at the thought of following through with such an act.
To some people who have no children dogs are their substitute. I hope you're never in that position.
I'm as big a dog lover as any. I also have kids. Dogs ain't children. Attachment doesnt make them so. They are a pet. Don't care about the emotion. It's a pet.
Shelters can kill dogs if there's no room for more dogs.
I know dogs are not children. My parents had 2 children but the 2 dogs they have they love just like they are their kids now that we are out of the house. Those dogs are devoted to just as they would devote themselves to a child. I have 4 children. My children are my everything. So I know the difference between the two. Sorry didn't mean to cause offense from my comment
Don’t apologize to people who can’t comprehend a metaphor. Also, pretty sure that one guy got bit by a dog and holds a grudge.
Technically true statement from the shoeshine boy. LOL Yet, kill someone's beloved pet, and watch what happens.
Did you intend to say, "Dogs are treated as children by some people?" Biologically, this statement doesn't fly. But I agree that it is pure evil, especially when the truckers are only standing up for the right to choose whether a non-vaccine (it does not protect against 'catching the disease' , and likely doesn't lessen symptoms either) can be forced on them. The threats to claim "Child endangerment" are a greater evil, and will be greater still if the brownshirts follow through.
It's clearly a metaphor likening how dog owners are emotionally invested in their dogs as parents are to their children.
I intended to imply that some people love their dog as much as they love a child.
That's what I thought. makes sense in some ways.
What statement? "Dogs are treated as children by some people?" That is merely a description of objective, observable reality rather than a biological statement; so it can't biologically fly or not fly IMO.