oh, boy. Yup. 100%!
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (65)
sorted by:
For a building designed in the traditional sense. The world trade centers were designed to have more of the weight distributed through the outer walls so as to require less interior support columns, making more room for office space. If the relatively few inner support columns are also damaged and weakend, you would see an implosion rather than toppling. Bear in mind the weight of the roof, which was 6ft thick, concrete and steel.
Not many buildings, if any, were built the way the towers were, so the best we have is computer models. And we know how trustworthy those can be.
You can find pictures of the debris field along Barclay street to see building 7. Even buildings along the north side were hit by falling debris.
The world trace center was retrofitted to withstand multple plane hits. there was a pool of molten steel for weeks after the event. thermite does this, not a plane fuel explosion which could somehow melt the very engine its injected into.
It was never retrofitted. I'm not sure where you got that info. In 1964 they did impact tests and calculated that the towers could withstand an impact from a 707.
And few people claim seeing a pool of molten steel. How do we know it was steel, and not say molten aluminum? Look up what happens when molten aluminim and water mixes. Why did no one take pictures of it? And what is thermite? Iron oxide and aluminum. Both of which would be found in the towers. Are you suggesting that iron microspheres is enough to claim thermite charges?
I'm not saying there was no conspiracy. Only that the end result was probably going to be achieved whether the towers fell or not. Thus why I said "not letting a good crisis go to waste". I believe the planes did the job, but I also believe the attacks were allowed to happen.
You have completely ignored building #7
How does a pro demolition work. They start a the bottom with the supports, yes? You're ignoring the video evidence of a fire under the penthouse of building 7.
Building 7
Look closely at the top left of 7. That's the penthouse. Notice how it collapses? And if you play the video slowly, you can spot the left side giving way before the right side. As you say, its not designed like the others, therefore it does depend on its inner support structure, which the penthouse has just fallen through.
Secondly, explain the damage here. 7 is the building in the upper left just in front of the white building at the top. that doesn't look symmetrical if that white building has been damaged. Barclay St. that same white building is now on the left. Kind of sloppy for a pro demo job.