Plus it wasn't censored(removed), it just has a warning that it might contain sensitive material. You could still view it. Honestly, I've been on 4chan/8chan/voat and have seen some things, like executions, that I really didn't want to see and did nothing to help me see the truth. I can see know the truth without seeing the actual act. Been there done that, it's fine. So, I can understand the warning, but definitely not censored.
This was my first thought, the statement is borderline call for violence.
Plus it wasn't censored(removed), it just has a warning that it might contain sensitive material. You could still view it. Honestly, I've been on 4chan/8chan/voat and have seen some things, like executions, that I really didn't want to see and did nothing to help me see the truth. I can see know the truth without seeing the actual act. Been there done that, it's fine. So, I can understand the warning, but definitely not censored.
So, this guy (not sure who he is), is lying. Warnings are not the same as censoring, and I'm sure he knows this.
Not seeing the connection between the guy's verbal statement and showing graphic executions
I'm assuming just the word triggered it. They may still be tweaking the algorithms, but no idea.
His use of the word “Should” destroys that take...its his opinion. 100% free speech