I saw a post claiming that a user was banned for saying White Lives Matter. Seems probably fake/trolling but I'm interested to see how robust the free speech is on Truth Social once more people are allowed in.
If they want to apply "sensitive content" tags equally to both sides of something that is literally a sensitive issue I'm down with that.
Whole point is that I want an unbiased platform that applies its rules equally and fairly.
Reddit/Twitter/Facebook are obviously way too far left and here we're obviously too far right with our biases. For here, it's fine because it's literally marketed as such and we needed this space.
But for something like Truth Social, a true intentional competitor to leftist social media, clear rules with clearly and fairly enforced rules to both sides is exactly what the space needs. Especially if it's not banning legal content.
I agree and think that’s their intention. Under trumps tag, there’s all kinds of people calling him names and trolling. I also have a theory that Truth may wind up being the EBS, which is why they are taking their time on the launch. I believe it’s been in the works since the beginning. He coined “fake news” from the beginning which eventually led to truth social being launched. The fact that he now has an open platform to truth (tweet) and hasn’t posted anything lends to my theory. I also haven’t been able to find don jr but that could be a me error?
Havent we learned that fake news is just that? Why would you fall for a narrative by those who are desperately trying to diminish a threat to their tyranny?
I saw a post claiming that a user was banned for saying White Lives Matter. Seems probably fake/trolling but I'm interested to see how robust the free speech is on Truth Social once more people are allowed in.
If Truth Social is gonna censor that and vax truth then fuck it I’ll delete my account.
I don’t think they are. They had a sensitive content warning but if you clicked on it, you could see it.
If they want to apply "sensitive content" tags equally to both sides of something that is literally a sensitive issue I'm down with that.
Whole point is that I want an unbiased platform that applies its rules equally and fairly.
Reddit/Twitter/Facebook are obviously way too far left and here we're obviously too far right with our biases. For here, it's fine because it's literally marketed as such and we needed this space.
But for something like Truth Social, a true intentional competitor to leftist social media, clear rules with clearly and fairly enforced rules to both sides is exactly what the space needs. Especially if it's not banning legal content.
I agree and think that’s their intention. Under trumps tag, there’s all kinds of people calling him names and trolling. I also have a theory that Truth may wind up being the EBS, which is why they are taking their time on the launch. I believe it’s been in the works since the beginning. He coined “fake news” from the beginning which eventually led to truth social being launched. The fact that he now has an open platform to truth (tweet) and hasn’t posted anything lends to my theory. I also haven’t been able to find don jr but that could be a me error?
Havent we learned that fake news is just that? Why would you fall for a narrative by those who are desperately trying to diminish a threat to their tyranny?