If normies fail to connect the dots, they truly are gullible enough to believe the big lie.
(media.greatawakening.win)
N C S W I C
Comments (23)
sorted by:
They often have cushie jobs, consisting of meetings and writing emails.
For people asking for the 'source'. You can find multiple sources. These are hard numbers. It's public info. If you have to ask for a source, then you're not doing what you're here to do: your own research.
Alternate source: https://www.financialmirror.com/2020/10/29/trumps-social-media-army-7-times-bigger-than-bidens/
It depends on when the article was written. Information is public. You can find their numbers anywhere, at any time.
It was a Trump landslide but where would we be next time a D was in office. It had to be this way.
This image doesn't prove anything. It only shows people were talking about Trump more, not that they were saying positive things. You might see the same if you used Hitler. He's clearly a hot topic of conversation all over the internet, but it doesn't mean he's popular. Anyone who suggests otherwise is "LITERALLY HITLER"
If you're going to show numbers in a meme, they need to be numbers which clearly show support, like rally attendance figures.
Source please! Otherwise this means nothing.
https://www.financialmirror.com/2020/10/29/trumps-social-media-army-7-times-bigger-than-bidens/
Thanks
What exactly are we looking at here though? How many votes each got from various social media? I'm confuzzled here.
Social media followers compared to their voter count.
Makes sense now, thanks!
There are so many bots on social media you can't take any counts as meaningful. Hell...Trump probably had 10 million bots following him to try and troll him. Biden probably had 12 million bots just to boost his like count.
Link mate....! Otherwise it’s meaningless...!
WWG1WGA
original pulled from reddit. alternate source:
https://www.financialmirror.com/2020/10/29/trumps-social-media-army-7-times-bigger-than-bidens/