I went through a period where I willing suspended my previous knowledge to properly assess this question.
No doubt there are some issues with the globe model, but there are a lot more with the flat-earth model.
For example, do you have a map of the earth that is flat? If you have, what kind of distances are involved in going from one 'side' of the world to the 'other' then match that to flight times. Doesn't work, but it does work if the planet is a globe.
Speed differentials between the poles and the equator when matched to the speed the earth is spinning and the wind patterns.
After millions of years you would expect the atmosphere to be spinning at the same speed as the landscape, but the 'speed' at the poles is basically 0mph, and the speed at the equator is around 10,000 mph iirc.
That should create some pretty gnarly winds as completely standard, yet we don't see that.
Not sure what the answer is, I might just have missed something obvious.
The Holy Spirit of God working upon the face of the waters, Genesis 1:2. One day, He is going to walk away from this mess, after the Harvest of Good Fruit, and then poof.
Wind isnt generated by spin of the earth. Where Im at, the wind generally travels west to east which means it travels in the same direction (northern hemisphere) and FASTER than the earth spin. If spin generated wind, it could not spin it faster than it itself moves.
I didn't say that wind was generated by the spin of the earth, but it should - that's the problem with the globe model.
Let's assume for a second that you have a zero wind day at both the equator and the north pole.
The air is technically travelling the same speed as the land, i.e. if the land is spinning at 10,000mph then the air is also, but that is also true at the pole.
Every system seeks equilibrium, but ours does not. Do you know why?
I'm not a flat-earther by the way, like I said the FE model is totally fubar, but I still have questions about the globe model.
The water being flat debunks that this planet is spinning at a thousand mph. I'm coming with some links here in a minute and if anyone doesn't watch them and still wants to argue then that means I've won their argument so if you don't have an open enough mind then they need to just keep their mouths shut they have no intelligence to argue with.
No it does not let me go find the link that proves otherwise and I'll get back to you but you see that I'm going to be very busy debunking the shit out of the globe theory. I made damn sure I had complete knowledge before I came on with it in here to set my trap and I can clearly see that I've triggered all kinds of mthrfkrs into taking the bait leading them all into my trap, before it's over with I'm going to render each and everyone of them silent not being able to have the last word and last laugh that 😂 button is mine for a change 😂
Science has absolutely nothing to do with it. We haven't been to outer space NASA itself has stated that on several occasions saying that we are not yet capable of penetrating outer orbit
I went through a period where I willing suspended my previous knowledge to properly assess this question.
No doubt there are some issues with the globe model, but there are a lot more with the flat-earth model.
For example, do you have a map of the earth that is flat? If you have, what kind of distances are involved in going from one 'side' of the world to the 'other' then match that to flight times. Doesn't work, but it does work if the planet is a globe.
The flat earth map existed way before the heliocentric map was ever created. Every ancient civilization recognized and depicted a flat earth map
What are the issues with globe model?
Speed differentials between the poles and the equator when matched to the speed the earth is spinning and the wind patterns.
After millions of years you would expect the atmosphere to be spinning at the same speed as the landscape, but the 'speed' at the poles is basically 0mph, and the speed at the equator is around 10,000 mph iirc.
That should create some pretty gnarly winds as completely standard, yet we don't see that.
Not sure what the answer is, I might just have missed something obvious.
The Holy Spirit of God working upon the face of the waters, Genesis 1:2. One day, He is going to walk away from this mess, after the Harvest of Good Fruit, and then poof.
Wind isnt generated by spin of the earth. Where Im at, the wind generally travels west to east which means it travels in the same direction (northern hemisphere) and FASTER than the earth spin. If spin generated wind, it could not spin it faster than it itself moves.
And def not 10,000 mph at the equator.
I didn't say that wind was generated by the spin of the earth, but it should - that's the problem with the globe model.
Let's assume for a second that you have a zero wind day at both the equator and the north pole.
The air is technically travelling the same speed as the land, i.e. if the land is spinning at 10,000mph then the air is also, but that is also true at the pole.
Every system seeks equilibrium, but ours does not. Do you know why?
I'm not a flat-earther by the way, like I said the FE model is totally fubar, but I still have questions about the globe model.
The water being flat debunks that this planet is spinning at a thousand mph. I'm coming with some links here in a minute and if anyone doesn't watch them and still wants to argue then that means I've won their argument so if you don't have an open enough mind then they need to just keep their mouths shut they have no intelligence to argue with.
What shape would you imagine water would be if it were spinning 1000mph?
Everything
Looking for specifics. Just start with one.
Ex. an issue with the FE model is the rotation of stars below the equator is opposite the rotation above the equator.
No it does not let me go find the link that proves otherwise and I'll get back to you but you see that I'm going to be very busy debunking the shit out of the globe theory. I made damn sure I had complete knowledge before I came on with it in here to set my trap and I can clearly see that I've triggered all kinds of mthrfkrs into taking the bait leading them all into my trap, before it's over with I'm going to render each and everyone of them silent not being able to have the last word and last laugh that 😂 button is mine for a change 😂
For some reason I get the distinct impression that this isn't about science for you.
Oh well.
Science has absolutely nothing to do with it. We haven't been to outer space NASA itself has stated that on several occasions saying that we are not yet capable of penetrating outer orbit