I didn't say that wind was generated by the spin of the earth, but it should - that's the problem with the globe model.
Let's assume for a second that you have a zero wind day at both the equator and the north pole.
The air is technically travelling the same speed as the land, i.e. if the land is spinning at 10,000mph then the air is also, but that is also true at the pole.
Every system seeks equilibrium, but ours does not. Do you know why?
I'm not a flat-earther by the way, like I said the FE model is totally fubar, but I still have questions about the globe model.
I have another one i just thought of. When youre driving down the highway with the windows up. The air around you isnt moving relative to you, but if you could see that air from outside the car youd say that air is moving very fast. So yeah a no wind day would have air moving at 1000 mph but everything would be moving the same speed so you wouldnt notice.
First of all lets call it 1000mph. Much closer to speed near equator.
What would be the problem with a zero wind day?
Since wind is not generated by spin, (do we both agree?) the real cause of wind would have to stop also. So no sun, no ocean currents, no heat transfer of any kind.
I've told you that I can't work out (i.e. physics) how the equator can have air moving at 1000mph and the pole can have air moving at 0mph without there being a constant current of air between the two.
Try this. Spin a snow globe at a constant speed. Do you have a turn table? At some point the snow will settle (equilibrium , zero wind). At that point look down into the globe from the top. The snow near the center (analogous to north pole) will be hardly moving at all. While the snow at the sides (anagous to the equator) will be spinning quite fast. Even though the snow is not moving relative to the snow globe, from outside that inertial reference point you can tell is is moving quite fast.
Well then why don't you just go study the research of others to work off of that and prove it to you're so you can come to an absolute conclusion who the hell wants to walk around with questions in their heads I sure as hell don't that's exactly what I did and damn sure don't be afraid of what people think damn that. Stand firm on your beliefs if you can you can smash everyone one of these brainwashed cats you'll win every argument that way
I didn't say that wind was generated by the spin of the earth, but it should - that's the problem with the globe model.
Let's assume for a second that you have a zero wind day at both the equator and the north pole.
The air is technically travelling the same speed as the land, i.e. if the land is spinning at 10,000mph then the air is also, but that is also true at the pole.
Every system seeks equilibrium, but ours does not. Do you know why?
I'm not a flat-earther by the way, like I said the FE model is totally fubar, but I still have questions about the globe model.
I have another one i just thought of. When youre driving down the highway with the windows up. The air around you isnt moving relative to you, but if you could see that air from outside the car youd say that air is moving very fast. So yeah a no wind day would have air moving at 1000 mph but everything would be moving the same speed so you wouldnt notice.
First of all lets call it 1000mph. Much closer to speed near equator.
What would be the problem with a zero wind day?
Since wind is not generated by spin, (do we both agree?) the real cause of wind would have to stop also. So no sun, no ocean currents, no heat transfer of any kind.
Sorry, yes, 1000mph is more like it.
I'm not sure what you are really asking me.
I've told you that I can't work out (i.e. physics) how the equator can have air moving at 1000mph and the pole can have air moving at 0mph without there being a constant current of air between the two.
Try this. Spin a snow globe at a constant speed. Do you have a turn table? At some point the snow will settle (equilibrium , zero wind). At that point look down into the globe from the top. The snow near the center (analogous to north pole) will be hardly moving at all. While the snow at the sides (anagous to the equator) will be spinning quite fast. Even though the snow is not moving relative to the snow globe, from outside that inertial reference point you can tell is is moving quite fast.
Well then why don't you just go study the research of others to work off of that and prove it to you're so you can come to an absolute conclusion who the hell wants to walk around with questions in their heads I sure as hell don't that's exactly what I did and damn sure don't be afraid of what people think damn that. Stand firm on your beliefs if you can you can smash everyone one of these brainwashed cats you'll win every argument that way