Call it TSQ if you want. Perhaps it will help others.
If someone was originally from the chans or if they paid attention to the drops and context of what happened, the truth social account will for now be considered unreliable and about as trustworthy as the E or R slides. That's basically why I at this time don't care whether anyone has an agreed upon reference or not for this new account.
I'm with you, just because my brain is tired of proofreading a document with way too many pronouns and not enough proper nouns to keep them straight. Clear antecedents lead to clear thought.
Not necessarily. People posting the TSQ account are going to link to it. People posting 8kun Q are going to link to one of the drop archive sites. The only confusion about which Q is which comes from people who are new and have not put time into understanding how things were setup and security measures that were agreed upon.
I get it though, if this site is bringing in new eyes without experience, and without initiative to do their own research and bring themselves up to speed, then TSQ might help distinguish for them.
It appears to me that you are reading far to much into what I said. Also you are claiming multiple things about my post that just are not there. And finally you are pretending I'm talking about you when I'm obviously not.
Last I checked you have been on GAW longer than I have. Please don't lump yourself into the new eyes group just to feign you have been slighted by me. Listen, it's not my problem if I start talking about new eyes and you decide you want to suddenly self categorize that to mean you so you can suggest I'm calling you out as a know nothing. I don't know where you are hearing that messaging when you read my posts, but it's not coming from me.
Maybe you thought something else I said was disparaging or applying peer pressure to shut down other people thinking for or investigating for themselves. You will have to be more specific, I'm not seeing it.
Call it TSQ if you want. Perhaps it will help others.
If someone was originally from the chans or if they paid attention to the drops and context of what happened, the truth social account will for now be considered unreliable and about as trustworthy as the E or R slides. That's basically why I at this time don't care whether anyone has an agreed upon reference or not for this new account.
I'm with you, just because my brain is tired of proofreading a document with way too many pronouns and not enough proper nouns to keep them straight. Clear antecedents lead to clear thought.
Not necessarily. People posting the TSQ account are going to link to it. People posting 8kun Q are going to link to one of the drop archive sites. The only confusion about which Q is which comes from people who are new and have not put time into understanding how things were setup and security measures that were agreed upon.
I get it though, if this site is bringing in new eyes without experience, and without initiative to do their own research and bring themselves up to speed, then TSQ might help distinguish for them.
It appears to me that you are reading far to much into what I said. Also you are claiming multiple things about my post that just are not there. And finally you are pretending I'm talking about you when I'm obviously not.
Last I checked you have been on GAW longer than I have. Please don't lump yourself into the new eyes group just to feign you have been slighted by me. Listen, it's not my problem if I start talking about new eyes and you decide you want to suddenly self categorize that to mean you so you can suggest I'm calling you out as a know nothing. I don't know where you are hearing that messaging when you read my posts, but it's not coming from me.
Maybe you thought something else I said was disparaging or applying peer pressure to shut down other people thinking for or investigating for themselves. You will have to be more specific, I'm not seeing it.