Platform was set. 8kun is the last platform we had drops on. I would appreciate if we could at least get a verifiable handshake between 8kun Q and TSQ.
Call it TSQ if you want. Perhaps it will help others.
If someone was originally from the chans or if they paid attention to the drops and context of what happened, the truth social account will for now be considered unreliable and about as trustworthy as the E or R slides. That's basically why I at this time don't care whether anyone has an agreed upon reference or not for this new account.
Not necessarily. People posting the TSQ account are going to link to it. People posting 8kun Q are going to link to one of the drop archive sites. The only confusion about which Q is which comes from people who are new and have not put time into understanding how things were setup and security measures that were agreed upon.
I get it though, if this site is bringing in new eyes without experience, and without initiative to do their own research and bring themselves up to speed, then TSQ might help distinguish for them.
I'm with you, just because my brain is tired of proofreading a document with way too many pronouns and not enough proper nouns to keep them straight. Clear antecedents lead to clear thought.
I look for the account to only be a mechanism to publicly avow the Q as legit. We may never know who the Q team is but Q+ I imagine will be confirmed at some point. At this point though there is substantial circumstantial evidence the Truth Social has something planned with this @Q account.
I'm going to go with no outside comms for now.
Platform was set. 8kun is the last platform we had drops on. I would appreciate if we could at least get a verifiable handshake between 8kun Q and TSQ.
Call it TSQ if you want. Perhaps it will help others.
If someone was originally from the chans or if they paid attention to the drops and context of what happened, the truth social account will for now be considered unreliable and about as trustworthy as the E or R slides. That's basically why I at this time don't care whether anyone has an agreed upon reference or not for this new account.
Not necessarily. People posting the TSQ account are going to link to it. People posting 8kun Q are going to link to one of the drop archive sites. The only confusion about which Q is which comes from people who are new and have not put time into understanding how things were setup and security measures that were agreed upon.
I get it though, if this site is bringing in new eyes without experience, and without initiative to do their own research and bring themselves up to speed, then TSQ might help distinguish for them.
I'm with you, just because my brain is tired of proofreading a document with way too many pronouns and not enough proper nouns to keep them straight. Clear antecedents lead to clear thought.
Poor reading comprehension unfortunately
It didn't come across that way, some people have to much pride and like to argue.
I look for the account to only be a mechanism to publicly avow the Q as legit. We may never know who the Q team is but Q+ I imagine will be confirmed at some point. At this point though there is substantial circumstantial evidence the Truth Social has something planned with this @Q account.
Well... that would be actually very Q-like.
Haven't people requested proof from Q and he/they delivered in some kind of way?
That would be the ultimate Q proof for me.
And I think we are in a time, where "ultimate" is quite a suitable adjective. :-D