What did Kash Patel mean by this on Truth Social? It was retruthed by the @Q account as well.
(media.greatawakening.win)
💥 BQQQQQQQQQM 💥
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (339)
sorted by:
The riddled assumptions here are unnecessary but makes it clear that is the way to innuendo and preface a convoluted point into an obvious, possessed, superiority complex. I will leave this as, assume as you will of intentions of others, what they do, or doing. I made nothing up. Plenty of crying and sniveling over stickies in comments by posters. Btw I served my country, dont attempt to preach to me about morale and what it takes in "this war"
My opinion count for anything? It does to those it impacts, others like yourself, I could care less if it does or not. In the real world it certainly does, in candyland on the internet like here for instance it may or may not and thats exceptional because I have no shits to give about it. PS if my opinion didn't matter why was it necessary to type up 2 lines of reasonable debate and 9 lines of nonsense to reply to a trivial topic lol.
Ill give you a B+ for the brother has heart and higher ground approach, was decent but easily discernible. Im sure you wont be able to resist that burning complex need to NOT reply so carry on with your superior self. Cheers
hahah
"Im sure you wont be able to resist that burning complex need to NOT reply so carry on with your superior self."
Alright. I accept that. Ironic that you just couldn't make your point without a kick in the shins and a dig in the ribs on the way out. But I did lay it on thick, so fair's fair.
That said, perhaps its worth dispensing with the rhetorical playing of games.
"PS if my opinion didn't matter why was it necessary to type up 2 lines..." I write. Occupational hazard.
Anyway, yeah, my comment was riddled with assumptions. And, I was uncharacteristically reactive, based on what the turd guy wrote.
I appreciate you sharing information about your service.
However, (in what might be a vain attempt to dial the exchange back into some semblance of reasonableness), I'll say, you agree with that guy. I disagree.
Unlike him, you stated your viewpoint civilly. I think the view you expressed was overly generalized, narrow in its conception, and frankly, rather arrogant and stuck up. But whatever. That's my view. I could have expressed that without making 1000 assumptions or going on a diatribe, but as I said, I was reactive.
But, whatever, I'll agree to disagree.
You are 100 percent right. I was at that moment kind of fed up with sticky frenzy id seen for a bit. I overly generalized and was fairly pretentious. I own it and appreciate real observed honesty. All is good and unlike some, some of us will be on the right side of history. Cheers
These days, I'm encountering the best quality anons.
Great awakening quickening. Thanks for the reply.
Respect.