If white hats are on the move and NCSWIC, it would be safe in the near future to finally put a face to Q, and start to validate the drops and info as a legitimate source. Regardless of the real source of the Q posts (everything seems to lean towards an MI team), to give the normies some grounding it should eventually be tied to a credible source.
I just hope its done right and they don't try and release it as a one man, "he's so smart he guessed everything by studying social/political sciences" kind of guy.
That would be Lame, and a discredit to the real hero(es) behind Q.... The ones I envision in my head.
Q always said they knew in advance because they had control. A small team could manage if they knew everything that was happening or what I suspect which is that most things happened around when Q posted and we are being told later.
Example: Q never said Hillary would be arrested publicly he just stated the time she would be arrested and that her visa and stuff was flagged so she could not flee. So I think they arrested her and probably podesta but they will "publicly" arrested podesta when the time is right.
doesn't even need to be quantum computers...
Computers with several competent Remote viewers could glean the most probable outcomes to a high degree of accuracy.
and enough to at least have a plan with several milestones and contingents.
Makes sense to me. Then its just a matter of making sure to line up public appearances and web posts to match events between actual and anounced arrests.
If white hats are on the move and NCSWIC, it would be safe in the near future to finally put a face to Q, and start to validate the drops and info as a legitimate source. Regardless of the real source of the Q posts (everything seems to lean towards an MI team), to give the normies some grounding it should eventually be tied to a credible source.
I just hope its done right and they don't try and release it as a one man, "he's so smart he guessed everything by studying social/political sciences" kind of guy.
That would be Lame, and a discredit to the real hero(es) behind Q.... The ones I envision in my head.
Q always said they knew in advance because they had control. A small team could manage if they knew everything that was happening or what I suspect which is that most things happened around when Q posted and we are being told later.
Example: Q never said Hillary would be arrested publicly he just stated the time she would be arrested and that her visa and stuff was flagged so she could not flee. So I think they arrested her and probably podesta but they will "publicly" arrested podesta when the time is right.
Don't discount the power of a Quantum computers ability to predict future trends with stunning accuracy
(see: Looking Glass, Project)
Q needs to give me 5mins with that machine after theyre done.
GIVE ME THE DAMN MACHINE
Just curious, what would you want it for?
doesn't even need to be quantum computers... Computers with several competent Remote viewers could glean the most probable outcomes to a high degree of accuracy.
and enough to at least have a plan with several milestones and contingents.
Makes sense to me. Then its just a matter of making sure to line up public appearances and web posts to match events between actual and anounced arrests.
Right. Let us not forget that Q posted something to the effect that we would all be amazed or surprised when we learn who Q is.
Sometimes the answer is right in front of you.
Q
I'm sure of that . . . I just don't know which one of the obvious candidates Q is. I tend to think Q's in the family . . .
Oh ok.
Q