I called both Barr and Pompeo Swamp,..well what happened to Barr,...Barr says " no evidence of widespread voter fraud," and of cause we all know now dont we,..,..I believe hes swamp,.but thats my opinion,..cheers
I wasnt necessarily disagreeing with your assertion they are swamp.The jury is still out on a lot of these people in this movie.
But it is disingenuous to call him CIA when he was the Director under Trump for a very short stint. He never held any other position in the CIA, he wasnt a field officer, he wasnt an analyst, he wasnt a station chief. Your phrasing implied he was.
I didn't know it was disingenuous to call someone who was in the cia for any number of time cia. News to me lol. I believe you're correct. Even if it was a short time and under Trump a lot of people close to him were betrayers and not all were found out. Someone like him can easily be an informant to leak things and frame them against him, without being caught is more tricky but not impossible. I don't trust most government even if they were close to Trump because Pence and others. And that still makes him cia. You never actually leave the cia, you just distance yourself appearance wise. They still have perks and access to things and connections don't just go away when you quit. If anything higher rank like director means more ability to hide corruption and "double agent" style behavior. CIA is swamp.
Calling Pompeo former CIA is disingenuous. He was the head of the CIA under Trump for a short time.
Pompeo was a businessman until the Tea Party movement put him in Office as a Representative from Kansas.
He has some swamplike ideas but I highly doubt he IS swamp. His political career has been too short.
I called both Barr and Pompeo Swamp,..well what happened to Barr,...Barr says " no evidence of widespread voter fraud," and of cause we all know now dont we,..,..I believe hes swamp,.but thats my opinion,..cheers
I wasnt necessarily disagreeing with your assertion they are swamp.The jury is still out on a lot of these people in this movie.
But it is disingenuous to call him CIA when he was the Director under Trump for a very short stint. He never held any other position in the CIA, he wasnt a field officer, he wasnt an analyst, he wasnt a station chief. Your phrasing implied he was.
I knew he was Director, but still of the CIA so no not Disingenuous at all,.
I didn't know it was disingenuous to call someone who was in the cia for any number of time cia. News to me lol. I believe you're correct. Even if it was a short time and under Trump a lot of people close to him were betrayers and not all were found out. Someone like him can easily be an informant to leak things and frame them against him, without being caught is more tricky but not impossible. I don't trust most government even if they were close to Trump because Pence and others. And that still makes him cia. You never actually leave the cia, you just distance yourself appearance wise. They still have perks and access to things and connections don't just go away when you quit. If anything higher rank like director means more ability to hide corruption and "double agent" style behavior. CIA is swamp.