The proof of the pudding is in the eating. The uranium bomb destroyed Hiroshima. The plutonium bomb was tested at Trinity and destroyed Nagasaki. In a flash, not in a conflagration. The Japanese knew better; they had been working on the technical problem also. Developments of fission bombs and hydrogen bombs were designed, produced, and tested in the 1950s, and made into operational warheads. The Soviet Union, United Kingdom, France, and China followed suit. Now including India and Israel. We have satellite sensors designed to detect the distinctive double-flash of a nuclear detonation, which is what led to the reported detection of an event by South Africa. Now nuclear tests are conducted underground, but they can still be detected seismically.
How is it possible for fictitious weapons to be detectable by airborne sampling, space observation, and seismology?
Your "documents" are bogus, if they even existed. There was no "carpet-bombing" campaigns against Hiroshima and Nagasaki, only a bomber and some reconnaissance planes. Read "The Effects of Nuclear Weapons" by Glasstone & Dolan and learn something.
I find it extraordinary that such thinking exists after all the tests during the late 40s into the 50s and early 60s. They were the cause of at least a quarter million deaths from drinking dairy products laden with nuke particles from fallout that drifted east into dairy country.
Add the oneupmanship of the Soviet Union's Tsar Bomba a 50 megaton monster and you have millions of acres of contaminated land and add to that Chernobyl and Fukushima and you have a more perfect poisoning of the world than expected..
Seriously where did this "nukes don't exist" come from? Is it this year's version of the invasion of flat Earthers and moon hoaxers we had last year around this time?
With respect, I think your numbers are unjustifiably high. And difficult to verify. Fukushima, for example, is a nothing, despite all the anxiety hype. Chernobyl was a nasty piece of work, but even that has been overblown.
OK then, just where ARE the 3 corium that escaped their containment 11 years ago?? Enough there to kill the Pacific, if it hasn't already with 500 tons of river water flowing over the corium every single day for the last 11 years. All this is difficult to verify because the japs are lying about everything and putting pretty barriers up to hide reality of the destroyed reactors. We already know the life span of a worker to fall into the pit is less than a minute. Until you do real digging to prove me wrong, my 5-6 years of digging says it IS a huge deal.
You are borderline coherent. There are no "corium" (there are reactor cores). They were contained, but melted down. The heat caused chemical reactions between the fuel cladding (e.g., zirconium) and the coolant water, resulting in hydrogen explosions and some release of radioactive gases (e.g., xenon), some of which got into the ocean. The whole story is ably summarized in this entry:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fukushima_Daiichi_nuclear_disaster_casualties
If you haven't been able to disprove what the Japanese are saying, how can you know they are lying? Your remark about lifespan is ridiculous. Only one man died who worked on the recovery, and it was from lung cancer that was imputed to radiation exposure. This digging is enough to show that your 5-6 years of digging was worthless.
The proof of the pudding is in the eating. The uranium bomb destroyed Hiroshima. The plutonium bomb was tested at Trinity and destroyed Nagasaki. In a flash, not in a conflagration. The Japanese knew better; they had been working on the technical problem also. Developments of fission bombs and hydrogen bombs were designed, produced, and tested in the 1950s, and made into operational warheads. The Soviet Union, United Kingdom, France, and China followed suit. Now including India and Israel. We have satellite sensors designed to detect the distinctive double-flash of a nuclear detonation, which is what led to the reported detection of an event by South Africa. Now nuclear tests are conducted underground, but they can still be detected seismically.
How is it possible for fictitious weapons to be detectable by airborne sampling, space observation, and seismology?
Your "documents" are bogus, if they even existed. There was no "carpet-bombing" campaigns against Hiroshima and Nagasaki, only a bomber and some reconnaissance planes. Read "The Effects of Nuclear Weapons" by Glasstone & Dolan and learn something.
I find it extraordinary that such thinking exists after all the tests during the late 40s into the 50s and early 60s. They were the cause of at least a quarter million deaths from drinking dairy products laden with nuke particles from fallout that drifted east into dairy country.
Add the oneupmanship of the Soviet Union's Tsar Bomba a 50 megaton monster and you have millions of acres of contaminated land and add to that Chernobyl and Fukushima and you have a more perfect poisoning of the world than expected..
Seriously where did this "nukes don't exist" come from? Is it this year's version of the invasion of flat Earthers and moon hoaxers we had last year around this time?
Aberrations come and go, but Truth never changes even when suppressed..
With respect, I think your numbers are unjustifiably high. And difficult to verify. Fukushima, for example, is a nothing, despite all the anxiety hype. Chernobyl was a nasty piece of work, but even that has been overblown.
OK then, just where ARE the 3 corium that escaped their containment 11 years ago?? Enough there to kill the Pacific, if it hasn't already with 500 tons of river water flowing over the corium every single day for the last 11 years. All this is difficult to verify because the japs are lying about everything and putting pretty barriers up to hide reality of the destroyed reactors. We already know the life span of a worker to fall into the pit is less than a minute. Until you do real digging to prove me wrong, my 5-6 years of digging says it IS a huge deal.
You are borderline coherent. There are no "corium" (there are reactor cores). They were contained, but melted down. The heat caused chemical reactions between the fuel cladding (e.g., zirconium) and the coolant water, resulting in hydrogen explosions and some release of radioactive gases (e.g., xenon), some of which got into the ocean. The whole story is ably summarized in this entry: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fukushima_Daiichi_nuclear_disaster_casualties
If you haven't been able to disprove what the Japanese are saying, how can you know they are lying? Your remark about lifespan is ridiculous. Only one man died who worked on the recovery, and it was from lung cancer that was imputed to radiation exposure. This digging is enough to show that your 5-6 years of digging was worthless.