Pfizer vaccine data. Of particular interest is page 30: full pages of known adverse effects…
(twitter.com)
💉VACCINE DATA RELEASE 💉
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (209)
sorted by:
Known adverse effects is not the same thing as proven vaccine injury. Adverse effects are merely reported after a vaccine. They are not proven to be caused by the vaccine.
VAERS states this. This report states this on page 6.
Again, your assumptions are hamstringing your validity as a claimed data scientist.
It's not exactly that it's a coincidence.
Doctors have to report every symptom that happens after a vaccine to VAERS.
So a 98 year old alcoholic who dies of liver failure a week after the vaccine? That's going in as a death in VAERS.
Nobody lied. Nobody committed fraud. But the vaccine didn't kill that person, even though it's in VAERS.
VAERS DEMANDS to have ALL symptoms that occur. Even ones that are absolutely not the vaccine. Not a single report is verified to have anything to do with the vaccine before it's listed in VAERS.
Because no report is verified, and EVERY symptom after EVERY vaccine is supposed to be reported, then yes, it's entirely possible that not a single report in VAERS or in this Pfizer report was caused by the vaccine. The system would, by design, be absolutely flooded with garbage data.
Every adverse reaction database works this way. They work like police tip lines. We don't assume we have 10,000 identical criminals just because one tip line got 10,000 tips. Many of those people were just wrong.
Oh hey that's how they inflated the Covid deaths too.
So why is one more legitimate than the other?
This isn’t true.
You aren’t required to report anything to VAERS after a trial has completed. If you have a doctor that is part of a Phase IV clinical trial after a new drug is brought to market you have to report it. VAERS is 100% voluntary, hence the Harvard study that said reported events are likely only 10% of the events that actually occurred. I understand correlation does not equal causation, but for events within the two week window of injection, you can be almost damned sure the event was due to the vaccine given the CDC’s definition of “when you’re vaccinated.” They’re claiming the mechanism of action takes that long to get your immune system to where it needs to be.
This is going to be a problem for all of the monoclonal antibody treatments because they never got out of EUA so there’s no reason to hold a Phase IV for any of these companies.
The bigger issue, to me, is that 1) adverse events are being reported, 2) they’re considered taboo to discuss, 3) the CDC is withholding data because they’re “worried how it’ll be interpreted,” and 4) Pfizer and the FDA both sued to keep these documents from coming to light. You can’t say the vaccine is totally fine if you don’t release the data for independent scholarly analysis.
Source: a parent who was part of fixing the shitshow that was the Merck MMR-II Outbreak from poor vaccine quality control with decades of experience with pharma trials and FDA reporting. Said parent has argued they’ve fought this disclosure in court because Pfizer “is technically released from liability” but the FDA is not when it comes to COVID vaccines.
Lol, so you're actually claiming the unprecedented amount of reports are potentially botched against the favor of a vaccine that has unprecedented protection against any form of skepticism at a significant ratio?
Man, of all your performances here this one is your worst by far.
The data in the report is verified and cross referenced for duplicates. The only time it is investigated is when an usual amount of reports surface for myocardia or deaths as a example.
It has not in the past or now flooded by garbage information.
Just the deaths have exceeded all vaccines for the past 30 years for Covid. That is a huge red flag. The CDC and the FDA have ignored and done zero investigations.
The last time the CDC and CDC did there job was the swine flu vaccine, With data on less than 35 deaths the FDA investigated and pulled the vaccine from the marketplace. In the end we lost 52 people from the vaccine before it was over.
It is not a police hot line from your comments. That comment is from ignorance. Data is input with the knowledge that jail time and fines for a fraudulent report. Johns Hopkins states that we capture only about 10 to 20 percent of adverse events. It serves as canary in the cold mine.
The data base is especially useful for detecting unusual or unexpected patterns of health problems (also called “adverse events”) that might indicate a possible safety problem with a vaccine.
We have a huge amount of data on other vaccines and it is easy to predict in a sub group of people the number of deaths, heart attacks and other medical issues will occur from any vaccine.
The other and only accurate source is autopsies. Only about 25% of the population end up in a autopsy that is not requested by law enforcement. We have at 61 cases of direct lengths to the vaccine.
Enough to immediately remove the vaccine form the marketplace if anyone was listening. The entire effort is the cover used to make this part of the New World Government
Changing the subject again when asked simply and directly to provide empirical evidence if your claims. This is a pattern. Which is why I’ve been engaging with you less.
It is immensely easier to put on the persona of expertise and intelligence by implying that empirically proving even a single one of your claims or establishing falsifiable premises is beneath you.
You’re like the third poster in this site’s history that has tried this strategy. It gets less effective when people see the avoidance pattern, and that’s hard to hide on a site full of pattern-seers.
I like the part where you projected the "changing subject" thing onto other people, when I read this whole "conversation" and you're the only one doing that (and ignoring/failing to address people's questions that have been asked about 5 times already). REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEDDIT