Planes make sound, and that sound may not make it through to the microphone in the same way we hear it in our ears. Also, someone else could end up pointing it out. Also, just because a camera is pointing somewhere doesn't mean eyes aren't pointing elsewhere.
I will never cease to be amazed at people's abilities here to put together the most out there theories with such incredible thought put into them... But then fail at such basic concepts as these.
Especially when there are more credible theories to focus on. There is a reason I immediately shoot down the possibility of lazor beams and hologram planes. Those are CIA disinfo campaigns used to muddy the water of credible and sound skepticism.
"9/11 Great American Psy-Opera" which shows clearly how they fucked up a mask layer and the CGI plane's nose accidently popped out of the far side of the building unharmed isn't real either. The magic plane somehow made it through 100 steel columns and popped out the other side.
I think the planes were CGI. The second plane in the footage we known about for ages has the left wing disappearing behind a building in the background right before impact.
That has been explained that from that angle and quality of camera was the way the image was picked up in the light.
So millions of other people who saw the plane were lying? They cabal technology is so good they inserted the plane on all the witness footage?
Were the planes actually missile drones? Very likely. A lot of witnesses have said things that it looked commercial but had no windows and so forth. But CGI is CIA bullshit to paint all skeptics as idiots.
"9/11 Great American Psy-Opera" which shows clearly how they fucked up a mask layer and the CGI plane's nose accidently popped out of the far side of the building unharmed isn't real either. The magic plane somehow made it through 100 steel columns and popped out the other side.
Planes make sound, and that sound may not make it through to the microphone in the same way we hear it in our ears. Also, someone else could end up pointing it out. Also, just because a camera is pointing somewhere doesn't mean eyes aren't pointing elsewhere.
I will never cease to be amazed at people's abilities here to put together the most out there theories with such incredible thought put into them... But then fail at such basic concepts as these.
Especially when there are more credible theories to focus on. There is a reason I immediately shoot down the possibility of lazor beams and hologram planes. Those are CIA disinfo campaigns used to muddy the water of credible and sound skepticism.
Eye-witness saying no plane
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WtHWlQgGZCI
"9/11 Great American Psy-Opera" which shows clearly how they fucked up a mask layer and the CGI plane's nose accidently popped out of the far side of the building unharmed isn't real either. The magic plane somehow made it through 100 steel columns and popped out the other side.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/2ynY9D0sfusP/
One person out of millions. And they compositied ALL of the ground footage of what happened?
I've talked to people who were there that watched both planes make impact and both towers go down. This is confirmed bullshit.
I think the planes were CGI. The second plane in the footage we known about for ages has the left wing disappearing behind a building in the background right before impact.
That has been explained that from that angle and quality of camera was the way the image was picked up in the light.
So millions of other people who saw the plane were lying? They cabal technology is so good they inserted the plane on all the witness footage?
Were the planes actually missile drones? Very likely. A lot of witnesses have said things that it looked commercial but had no windows and so forth. But CGI is CIA bullshit to paint all skeptics as idiots.
I see the wing disappearing behind the building, doubt you will change my mind on that.
GWB saw a plane hit the first tower where millions of people didnt. Does that make it true then?
the helicopter is heard clearly for minutes, yet the jet is only heard moments before. Microphone seems to be selective, then? Right.
Your counter point is is moot.
I am also extremely curious to know how not one person point out yelled out an approaching 747 until it was directly over head??
How is that not a valid question??
Unironically comparing a hovering, slow moving vehicle to a jet...
In the context of sound waves, both are relative. Try to keep up.
Btw using the word unironically interchangeably with the word literally is incorrect.
Eye-witness saying no plane
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WtHWlQgGZCI
"9/11 Great American Psy-Opera" which shows clearly how they fucked up a mask layer and the CGI plane's nose accidently popped out of the far side of the building unharmed isn't real either. The magic plane somehow made it through 100 steel columns and popped out the other side.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/2ynY9D0sfusP/
So millions of other people who saw the plane were lying? They cabal technology is so good they inserted the plane on all the witness footage?
Please let me know how he knew it was the United flight. I'm waiting.
The colors.
here's are some basic concepts for you to grasp:
his camera was pointed in the exact location the plane appears moments later.
he "forgot" to share this video publicly - for 20 years. He uploaded it to YT, but just set it to private.
I will never cease to be amazed at people turning a blind eye to things that make zero sense.