Electric universe yes, flat earth no. I find it suspicious these are mentioned together so frequently, like it is there to poison the electric universe idea.
The earth has corners. We are living in one big hologram. Spelling might be off. But it's definitely an illusion of light. If we trust atomic theory; its mostly empty space. There is a lot of empty space[pun on stupidity goes here]. Go 40,000 ft and report back please. Im just trying to keep food on the table; me no get to play with aircraft. God bless all patriots and pedes'. And God bless our sleepers. Judgement day is a comin'!
I see you failed in your research if you researched it at all. I can stand up for my beliefs and I can fight for them and with that I always win just by using the research of a select few
No truth seeker believes it's a flying pizza in space- get real faggot.
Perhaps, more like a sheet of ice with a spot melted in it. We might live in that melted out basin with a local sun and moon. The surrounding ice creates the southern coast (see operation highjump). Space as we know it- is simply a NASA lie.
Due to operation highjump led by Admiral Richard E. Byrd (1946) following the close of World War II: 'normal people' are not allowed to freely explore the continent of Antarctica because of "The Antarctic Treaty," signed by 12 nations in 1959.
NASA was founded via operation paperclip in '58. The nazis never lost. They went underground and expanded to every nation via globalism.
Who the hell said it's a flying fkn pizza your ass must be listening to that fake ass flat earth society. This mthrfkr ain't no disk, it ain't no pizza, frisbee none of that BS. It's not a sphere and it's not spinning as it travels through a space that doesn't exist. It is what the Bible says it is
Teslas transmission methods rely on creating perturbations of the earths magnetic (and therefore dielectric) fields. In the same way a pebble in a lake sends out waves, Tesla was dropping "pebbles" into the "lake" which is the earths dielectric field. Unlike water however, these perturbations once energetically established require no energy to maintain so they can travel long distances. His towers, which he wanted to build "around the globe" at certain points would "pump" the field at a certain frequency and the result would be a wave "everywhere" that could then be tapped for useful energy. Because the placement and frequency was going to be resonant with the geometry of the earth the energy in could be relatively minor compared with the energy out, as you are in a sense pushing around a "heavy weight" with a small force, but when tapping that energy you are tapping off the "momentum" of the "heavy weight" so it was about as efficient as transmission can be.
Anyway this relies on a round spherical earth. In the same way, the striking of lightning around the world gives the earth its "Schumann resonance" because all the energy from the lightning is dissipated except that which is resonant with the geometry of the earth, that resonant portion remains and bounces around. It can be calculated based on the geometry of the earth and measured to be what you would expect from that geometry, essentially proving the earth round. (there are many other proofs the earth is round too, while the flat earth proofs rely on errors of scale and other unintuitive phenomena, like the horizon "appearing" flat at ground level etc)
Have you dig Texzon Energy? Midland, Texas Tesla tower.
It’s a fun dig. I went. Everyone is Naval Intel: contracts sending energy to Bahrain by bouncing the waves across the crust.
Now, Sommerfeld described an electrodynamic wave that is guided along a wire of finite conductivity and Zenneck expanded upon this description, asserting that the earth's surface performs in a manner similar to a conducting wire. And, while the Norton wave is the result of electrical currents induced in the earth by refraction of a portion of the reflected-wave component of the ground-wave at the earth-atmosphere interface, the surface wave associated with Tesla's apparatus is the result of electrical ground currents flowing between two discrete points on the earth's surface. Unlike the lossy Norton wave that is excited by a conventional AM radio transmitter it would seem that Tesla's low-frequency surface wave would not diminish quite as significantly as the distance from the source facility increases. [See "A Comparison of the Tesla and Marconi LF Wireless Systems"]
Flat earth is literally only brought in to discredit us, by allowing others to reference these flat earth threads and say "oh they are just a bunch of flat earthers and qanons." IMO, the topic should not be allowed here only for the reason that it's used to discredit, I'm sure a "flatearth.win" would be a nice echo chamber.
Besides, every bit of evidence supportive of flat earth relies on scientific principles that are improperly scaled up to planetary scales, as well as assuming the globe as a perfect sphere as opposed to something closer to egg-shaped with mountains and valleys, neglecting that water cannot be compressed (yes, you can pressurize water but it doesn't change the volume of it), and finally that light curves in a fluid (atmosphere).
Electric Universe theory is a viable theory that has plenty of supporting evidence, even if not really accepted by the mainstream.
Where did you come up with that logic flat earth is only here to discredit us 🤔 You got shit fkd up flat earth was proven way before this was even an idea. So you telling me that the Bible and every ancient civilization was full of shit or something, the heliocentric model hasn't been around too long and it's very easy to debunk. I don't know what you basing that nonsense on but I'll debunk anything you say I can't debunk.
I came up with that logic after having gone through those debates on the subject. Which I only did after absorbing all information on the subject that I could find (and the OP video isn't even one of the better ones).
In all those debates, I have never met a group who could more skillfully shift goalposts. Then I see how normies respond, flat earth and conspiracy theorist are the two top go to dismissals.
And no, I am not going to entertain another debate on the issue for two reasons:
1- I already gave you the counter to any argument you might make
2- It weakens my stance that I don't even believe that we should entertain such theories on this board because of how it gets used against us.
No, ancients weren't wrong, through simple ground level observation a flat earth is a reasonable model.
Simply, you are wrong, and the motivation to continue the debate here, for me at least, raises a shill alarm.
I wasn't trying to debate you and I'm not trying to debate you now I was just asking you a question and made a few statements but since you are now insinuating that I'm a shill if I further the conversation which I will respect your beliefs although I must say that I went through the proper process in which ones self must go through in order for one to change his own beliefs. It was a 3yr step by step process in which I gathered all of the information that I could find from each side of the equation with only one source of information rejected I didn't include any type of information provided by NASA on the grounds that due to the fakeness was no longer credible. Three years I studied without leaning towards one side of the other unit I was completely satisfied that one side weighed more than the other. One side being flat earth completely decimated the globe model it had won the Earth is flat.
And you came to your conclusions based on a debate of a few people on each side making their argument and in your mind you determined a winner which proved to you the earth was a globe. 🤔 Really okay it is you that is remeniscent to being a shill because no intelligent critical thinking person would ever come to their conclusions based upon the winner of a debate. The earth is flat.
Yup. On a good day I can see a lighthouse that should be hidden by about 18 feet. And not only do I see the lighthouse, I can see the waves crashing on the rocks it sits on which are about 100 ft below it.
The surface of the Earth is flat and that's that. It has been proven in every way possible and the heliocentric globe model has been debunked in every way possible and if any of you care to challenge that just tell me what you believe about the globe model that debunks flat Earth and I'll send a link that debunks whatever it is you send.
I went through a 3yr process in order to prove it to myself it took me three years for my beliefs to change. It's flat and you can take that to the bank
NASA's (Nazi started/ operation paperclip) original papers assumed a flat stationary Earth for all calculations. Later they came up with math for the assumed curvature of the Earth, but it makes zero sense when applied to our visible reality.
Electric universe yes, flat earth no. I find it suspicious these are mentioned together so frequently, like it is there to poison the electric universe idea.
The earth has corners. We are living in one big hologram. Spelling might be off. But it's definitely an illusion of light. If we trust atomic theory; its mostly empty space. There is a lot of empty space[pun on stupidity goes here]. Go 40,000 ft and report back please. Im just trying to keep food on the table; me no get to play with aircraft. God bless all patriots and pedes'. And God bless our sleepers. Judgement day is a comin'!
I see you failed in your research if you researched it at all. I can stand up for my beliefs and I can fight for them and with that I always win just by using the research of a select few
No truth seeker believes it's a flying pizza in space- get real faggot.
Perhaps, more like a sheet of ice with a spot melted in it. We might live in that melted out basin with a local sun and moon. The surrounding ice creates the southern coast (see operation highjump). Space as we know it- is simply a NASA lie.
Due to operation highjump led by Admiral Richard E. Byrd (1946) following the close of World War II: 'normal people' are not allowed to freely explore the continent of Antarctica because of "The Antarctic Treaty," signed by 12 nations in 1959.
NASA was founded via operation paperclip in '58. The nazis never lost. They went underground and expanded to every nation via globalism.
The great awakening won't be for everyone.
Who the hell said it's a flying fkn pizza your ass must be listening to that fake ass flat earth society. This mthrfkr ain't no disk, it ain't no pizza, frisbee none of that BS. It's not a sphere and it's not spinning as it travels through a space that doesn't exist. It is what the Bible says it is
God Bless you, fren.
We agree
Teslas transmission methods rely on creating perturbations of the earths magnetic (and therefore dielectric) fields. In the same way a pebble in a lake sends out waves, Tesla was dropping "pebbles" into the "lake" which is the earths dielectric field. Unlike water however, these perturbations once energetically established require no energy to maintain so they can travel long distances. His towers, which he wanted to build "around the globe" at certain points would "pump" the field at a certain frequency and the result would be a wave "everywhere" that could then be tapped for useful energy. Because the placement and frequency was going to be resonant with the geometry of the earth the energy in could be relatively minor compared with the energy out, as you are in a sense pushing around a "heavy weight" with a small force, but when tapping that energy you are tapping off the "momentum" of the "heavy weight" so it was about as efficient as transmission can be.
Anyway this relies on a round spherical earth. In the same way, the striking of lightning around the world gives the earth its "Schumann resonance" because all the energy from the lightning is dissipated except that which is resonant with the geometry of the earth, that resonant portion remains and bounces around. It can be calculated based on the geometry of the earth and measured to be what you would expect from that geometry, essentially proving the earth round. (there are many other proofs the earth is round too, while the flat earth proofs rely on errors of scale and other unintuitive phenomena, like the horizon "appearing" flat at ground level etc)
Correct.
Have you dig Texzon Energy? Midland, Texas Tesla tower.
It’s a fun dig. I went. Everyone is Naval Intel: contracts sending energy to Bahrain by bouncing the waves across the crust.
The horizon does not prove a globe Earth in fact it proves a flat earth
Fucking. ZING. Gahhh !!!
Flat earth is literally only brought in to discredit us, by allowing others to reference these flat earth threads and say "oh they are just a bunch of flat earthers and qanons." IMO, the topic should not be allowed here only for the reason that it's used to discredit, I'm sure a "flatearth.win" would be a nice echo chamber.
Besides, every bit of evidence supportive of flat earth relies on scientific principles that are improperly scaled up to planetary scales, as well as assuming the globe as a perfect sphere as opposed to something closer to egg-shaped with mountains and valleys, neglecting that water cannot be compressed (yes, you can pressurize water but it doesn't change the volume of it), and finally that light curves in a fluid (atmosphere).
Electric Universe theory is a viable theory that has plenty of supporting evidence, even if not really accepted by the mainstream.
Where did you come up with that logic flat earth is only here to discredit us 🤔 You got shit fkd up flat earth was proven way before this was even an idea. So you telling me that the Bible and every ancient civilization was full of shit or something, the heliocentric model hasn't been around too long and it's very easy to debunk. I don't know what you basing that nonsense on but I'll debunk anything you say I can't debunk.
I came up with that logic after having gone through those debates on the subject. Which I only did after absorbing all information on the subject that I could find (and the OP video isn't even one of the better ones).
In all those debates, I have never met a group who could more skillfully shift goalposts. Then I see how normies respond, flat earth and conspiracy theorist are the two top go to dismissals.
And no, I am not going to entertain another debate on the issue for two reasons:
1- I already gave you the counter to any argument you might make
2- It weakens my stance that I don't even believe that we should entertain such theories on this board because of how it gets used against us.
No, ancients weren't wrong, through simple ground level observation a flat earth is a reasonable model.
Simply, you are wrong, and the motivation to continue the debate here, for me at least, raises a shill alarm.
I wasn't trying to debate you and I'm not trying to debate you now I was just asking you a question and made a few statements but since you are now insinuating that I'm a shill if I further the conversation which I will respect your beliefs although I must say that I went through the proper process in which ones self must go through in order for one to change his own beliefs. It was a 3yr step by step process in which I gathered all of the information that I could find from each side of the equation with only one source of information rejected I didn't include any type of information provided by NASA on the grounds that due to the fakeness was no longer credible. Three years I studied without leaning towards one side of the other unit I was completely satisfied that one side weighed more than the other. One side being flat earth completely decimated the globe model it had won the Earth is flat. And you came to your conclusions based on a debate of a few people on each side making their argument and in your mind you determined a winner which proved to you the earth was a globe. 🤔 Really okay it is you that is remeniscent to being a shill because no intelligent critical thinking person would ever come to their conclusions based upon the winner of a debate. The earth is flat.
There's no curvature. I'm out on the ocean right now and can see a jetty that should be hidden by about 10 feet of curvature.
You are absolutely correct curvature cannot be proven nor can it be seen with the naked eye
Yup. On a good day I can see a lighthouse that should be hidden by about 18 feet. And not only do I see the lighthouse, I can see the waves crashing on the rocks it sits on which are about 100 ft below it.
The surface of the Earth is flat and that's that. It has been proven in every way possible and the heliocentric globe model has been debunked in every way possible and if any of you care to challenge that just tell me what you believe about the globe model that debunks flat Earth and I'll send a link that debunks whatever it is you send. I went through a 3yr process in order to prove it to myself it took me three years for my beliefs to change. It's flat and you can take that to the bank
Can you send me the link just so I have it? Thanks in advance fren. Peace and grace to you and yours'.
There are possibly thousands of links I can choose from what part about it would you like to learn about?
Anything you got. I am [attempting] to binge on info. I dont have a macbook. Been on rumble and rudetube and seek knowledge. shrug
https://youtu.be/vcQzsO9gdp8
https://youtu.be/DtNTjldC0aw
https://youtu.be/cFJpWCOQGAU
This is wonderful. Thank you again.
https://youtu.be/UR1s8QatXYI
NASA's (Nazi started/ operation paperclip) original papers assumed a flat stationary Earth for all calculations. Later they came up with math for the assumed curvature of the Earth, but it makes zero sense when applied to our visible reality.
The great awakening won't be for everyone.