New Special Counsel Durham filing
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (59)
sorted by:
I'm an idiot I guess. What's criminal about working for Twatter?
Working at twatter is not the crime - it's the payoff for committing the crime. The criminal part happened when Baker was with the FBI and Sussman was feeding him false information to frame Trump (all based on the deboinked "Steele Dossier", paid for by the Hildabeast) - Twatter jobs are the soft landing spot after they were forced out of their previous positions - that also could lead to twatter being implicated as being in on the plan to frame PDJT.
You probably appreciate this, but for the sake of discussion, there are likely many such landing spots. Book deals, academic appointments, correspondent jobs at media companies, work at prestigious law firms, a lot of "consultant" work where you don't really even have to define what you're doing while you sell your connections to the good ole boy network, etc.
If you scratch their back, they'll see you're taken care of. Kind of like watching The Godfather.
Ooh -- get Zuckerbot, too!
Him and his ballot laundering, or whatever you call it.
AND the governors who were involved.
I'm calling it "Mark Psakiberg"
I was thinking them working at Twitter was about, essentially Deep State control. I see the payoff part now that you mention it, lol kind of obvious, but I was thinking it was about controlling Twitter.
What do you think about the part to help to control of Twitter possibility? Bit of a mix or more Payoff, etc.
I like how you think!
would be tough to prove, unless they were hiring these clowns as something they clearly are not (computer scientists or whatever)
I say work where you can and want to, but don't fall for the brainwashing and indoctrination. Maybe more people will see things the way you/we do.