Yikes!! New-York-Times-journalist-51-shot-dead-Russian-troops-Ukraine (Daily Mail)
(www.dailymail.co.uk)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (43)
sorted by:
I will note here that it does not suit the Russians to shoot dead a prominent journalist.
He works for the New York Times. He is not a journalist. He is a satanic globalist. He was there to print the wrong stories to drum up support for a war which the citizens of the world do not want or need.
Actually, the article says that though he was carrying a press pass listing the New York Times, he was not currently working for the NYT. He's worked for them in the past, but was not on assignment for them when this happened.
Sounds like he was freelance. He and his brother were both killed if I'm reading the caption on the picture accurately (though they don't mention his brother specifically in the story). The Daily Mail is schlock. The headline is deceptive. What a shocker these days, right?
It may not have been the Russians who shot him, he may not have even been shot. Too early to tell.
What exactly happened is not clear yet, we just have the headline