Mittens PANIC. Tulsi Gabbard’s response...
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (70)
sorted by:
If someone were known to be a Nazi but then one day started claiming to want to abolish abortion, would the ambiguous aspect of their untrustworthiness be enough to make you waste time on them? Of course not.
So why would any of us waste time on this woman?
I'm the guy who still reserves judging the positions of Flynn and Lin.
I'm trying to focus on the signal and not the noise.
All I know, is she was the only dem that Trump sat down and talked to after winning the election.
Don't take my position as being in support of her, nor have I defended her here either, read my posts, I'm clearly stating that I'll wait until the dust settles.
I've also said that her position on 2A is shit, I've also said we don't need to hear from her.
For sure but I mean, even if all her positions seemed great, what are any of us supposed to do with that? Vote for a Democrat WEF demon because she seems to have changed her mind out of the blue, and hope the people who put her in a high position haven't always had some leverage over her to begin wtih?
No, where in my reply did I ever say you should trust her?
Her position on 2A renders her out of the running.
I'm merely pointing out that I don't know if she is deepstate or not, attending the WEF is not enough for me to condemn her.
There are plenty of other things that I dislike about her political positions as is.
There is only a few things that I hold in her favour, and that's her conduct during the democrat primaries. She lost her high position in the democrat party because she went against Hillary.
Other than that, I don't have much good to say about her.
And anyone who reads my last few posts and thinks I'm in support of her, should get their reading comprehension up to scratch.