Don't Teach Graphic Sexual Practices to Minor Children
...then fewer people would have a problem supporting it
As if anyone would obey a law against "SAYING" a word. Freedom of speech isn't a suggestion. Calling it "Don't Say Gay" is nothing but a Linguistic Psy Op using overgeneralization.
Like when they say "Trump mocks THE DISABLED". He really mocked, once, the disorganized fuzzy logic of just ONE specific fake news reporter who happens to have a disability. And he did it using a swirling gesture Trump had used often before to indicate confusion—it was the exact opposite of the reporter's disability (clonus, or the inability to move his hand).
Notice how they manipulate the language
Don't Say Gay
Absurd.
But if the more accurate title were used,
Don't Teach Graphic Sexual Practices to Minor Children
...then fewer people would have a problem supporting it
As if anyone would obey a law against "SAYING" a word. Freedom of speech isn't a suggestion. Calling it "Don't Say Gay" is nothing but a Linguistic Psy Op using overgeneralization.
Like when they say "Trump mocks THE DISABLED". He really mocked, once, the disorganized fuzzy logic of just ONE specific fake news reporter who happens to have a disability. And he did it using a swirling gesture Trump had used often before to indicate confusion—it was the exact opposite of the reporter's disability (clonus, or the inability to move his hand).
/wordnerd
"Don't say gay" is attempting to set some ground rules going forward in which some people will be addressed as "more than gay"........as in p*dos.
Exactly. We know it as the anti-grooming bill. Whenever I hear, "Don't say Gay" bill, I correct them and say, "Oh you mean the anti-grooming bill?"
wurd
They do this all the time.