I don't see the smoking gun here. Maybe someone can help me out?
The image of the chart (and the article Purkiss linked) says "Vaccinated" not "Fully Vaccinated", contradicting what the inserted commentary below it claims. According to the article, 92% of covid cases, hospitalizations, deaths have been from those who have had at least one dose. Coincidently, 92% of the UK population age 12 and over have received one dose.
Only 69.5% of the UK has recieved atleast 1 dose (numbers go down from there).
Vaccine coverage tells us about the proportion of the population that have received one, 2 and 3 doses of COVID-19 vaccines. By 6 March 2022, the overall vaccine uptake in England for dose 1 was 69.5% and for dose 2 was 65.0%. Overall vaccine uptake in England in people with at least 3 doses was 50.5%. In line with the programme rollout, coverage is highest in the oldest age groups.
I haven’t read the report yet. Until I do so and actually examine in-group and cross-group characteristics/comparisons, I’m playing it safe and saying that the vaccines simply aren’t able to protect people like originally claimed.
Ideally 100% of the death and hospitalization would be the unjabbed. If the percentage stays constant regardless of status then it’s hard to claim any positive benefits at all. When you factor in the mystery deaths and sudden collapse or myocarditis, the experimental jab juice doesn’t stand out as a positive thing to take. I realize NPCs will rationalize the deaths as a sign that it is working. They may be correct
I don't see the smoking gun here. Maybe someone can help me out?
The image of the chart (and the article Purkiss linked) says "Vaccinated" not "Fully Vaccinated", contradicting what the inserted commentary below it claims. According to the article, 92% of covid cases, hospitalizations, deaths have been from those who have had at least one dose. Coincidently, 92% of the UK population age 12 and over have received one dose.
https://www.bbc.com/news/health-55274833
So what's the big deal here? 92% of the population is vaxxed. 92% of hospitalizations, etc. should be from those who have been vaxxed.
Only 69.5% of the UK has recieved atleast 1 dose (numbers go down from there).
Thats a quote from the same report. Link below.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1060030/vaccine-surveillance-report-week-10.pdf
So, at best, the vaccine is basically useless.
At worst, it’s creating vaccine enhanced advanced disease, which was a reported potential risk in the first batch of Pfizer documents from ICAN
No, these numbers prove the Vaccinated have a higher death rate.
I haven’t read the report yet. Until I do so and actually examine in-group and cross-group characteristics/comparisons, I’m playing it safe and saying that the vaccines simply aren’t able to protect people like originally claimed.
So the knly take away here is that the Vaccine is irrelevant and has no meaningful POSITIVE impact.
NEGATIVE impact is "disputed" by some.
Ideally 100% of the death and hospitalization would be the unjabbed. If the percentage stays constant regardless of status then it’s hard to claim any positive benefits at all. When you factor in the mystery deaths and sudden collapse or myocarditis, the experimental jab juice doesn’t stand out as a positive thing to take. I realize NPCs will rationalize the deaths as a sign that it is working. They may be correct