I'm sorry if my life does not have the time to fulfill your research assignments.
This is the key issue. You assume everyone else has the time to teach you. What of their schedules....or do they not factor into your equations of information requirements?
Look, I gave you a lead to follow. If you wanted to know more about it, as all truth seekers would, then there ya go....no problem. What I find, however, is people profess to be truthseekers when in fact they're only here to sponge off the ones who really are. You want the truth, then find it. I'll not be someone's hand-maid through their journey---that's up to them.
Don't be absurd. You can't write a sentence? If you know your material, you can always condense it into a few sentences to get the main point across. And wait for questions. The fact that you go on like this only shows that you have plenty of time for a few sentences.
As far as I am concerned, there is no reason to doubt that Switzerland fulfills the description of "neutral." You said "no." I asked why you said no---and you couldn't be bothered to answer. So, fine. I'm not that curious, if you are not that dedicated to your point of view, I'm willing to take that as an answer.
A sentence. Ok, Switzerlands roots in what it is today is solidly from the Templars (early masonic practices): their flag, strategic location, and banking practices that have been carried forward to present day, albeit tragically abused, now used by the global cartels and elites. The Yearly meeting in Davos ring any bells in that box you've created?
They are by no means neutral by association and capitulation.
P.S. the info is absurdly easy to find. Ciest la vie.
The Swiss have always been mercenaries (e.g., Swiss Guards). Neutrality is not becoming engaged in wars between two contending nations or alliances. It doesn't mean they don't play favorites. Everyone is self-interested. I don't see any revelation in any of this. But thanks for finally disclosing your wisdom.
This is the key issue. You assume everyone else has the time to teach you. What of their schedules....or do they not factor into your equations of information requirements?
Look, I gave you a lead to follow. If you wanted to know more about it, as all truth seekers would, then there ya go....no problem. What I find, however, is people profess to be truthseekers when in fact they're only here to sponge off the ones who really are. You want the truth, then find it. I'll not be someone's hand-maid through their journey---that's up to them.
Don't be absurd. You can't write a sentence? If you know your material, you can always condense it into a few sentences to get the main point across. And wait for questions. The fact that you go on like this only shows that you have plenty of time for a few sentences.
As far as I am concerned, there is no reason to doubt that Switzerland fulfills the description of "neutral." You said "no." I asked why you said no---and you couldn't be bothered to answer. So, fine. I'm not that curious, if you are not that dedicated to your point of view, I'm willing to take that as an answer.
A sentence. Ok, Switzerlands roots in what it is today is solidly from the Templars (early masonic practices): their flag, strategic location, and banking practices that have been carried forward to present day, albeit tragically abused, now used by the global cartels and elites. The Yearly meeting in Davos ring any bells in that box you've created?
They are by no means neutral by association and capitulation.
P.S. the info is absurdly easy to find. Ciest la vie.
The Swiss have always been mercenaries (e.g., Swiss Guards). Neutrality is not becoming engaged in wars between two contending nations or alliances. It doesn't mean they don't play favorites. Everyone is self-interested. I don't see any revelation in any of this. But thanks for finally disclosing your wisdom.