Funny how my original research/comment gets downvoted, as if someone really want to promote a fake story and made us look crazy and unprofessional.
I understand people voting for an article, just because of the subject (hopium), but if they have detailed instructions in the comment how to verify it themselves - how they can downvote? They're either shills or hopeless MSM fans. A message to this last group: "Sorry, I cannot play this google search on your TV."
It's not easy to interpret downdoots. People do a downdoot for different reasons.
For example, your comment started out with "Fake" which is a pretty strong assertion. People who thought it is genuine may well downvote because they want to demote a wrong statement.
I looked at TSAOW's reply, and concluded it was genuine. But revisiting the topic, I have to say, inconclusive and probably faked (partially - all good disinfo/fakery involves mixing truth with fiction).
On the other hand, TSAOW's reply also contained easily viewable links. Your comment was more of a primer on HOW to research.
But I think your conclusion "either shills or hopeless MSM fans" is way too extreme, and actually not helpful. Yes, we have some shills, but the board is also home to a wide variety of pedes at all different levels of the Great Awakening experience. Solidarity is important, imo.
Updoot for digs. Kudos. However, TSAOW got the good sauce.
Keep digging, tho.
Funny how my original research/comment gets downvoted, as if someone really want to promote a fake story and made us look crazy and unprofessional.
I understand people voting for an article, just because of the subject (hopium), but if they have detailed instructions in the comment how to verify it themselves - how they can downvote? They're either shills or hopeless MSM fans. A message to this last group: "Sorry, I cannot play this google search on your TV."
It's not easy to interpret downdoots. People do a downdoot for different reasons.
For example, your comment started out with "Fake" which is a pretty strong assertion. People who thought it is genuine may well downvote because they want to demote a wrong statement.
I looked at TSAOW's reply, and concluded it was genuine. But revisiting the topic, I have to say, inconclusive and probably faked (partially - all good disinfo/fakery involves mixing truth with fiction).
On the other hand, TSAOW's reply also contained easily viewable links. Your comment was more of a primer on HOW to research.
But I think your conclusion "either shills or hopeless MSM fans" is way too extreme, and actually not helpful. Yes, we have some shills, but the board is also home to a wide variety of pedes at all different levels of the Great Awakening experience. Solidarity is important, imo.