Its probably a revolving door of reporters getting in, burning out immediately by the bullshit, then leaving. The ones that stay are idealogues willing to push the editorial agenda. Its no real wonder none of them know what previous generations of NYT newsies wrote/reported.
Very insightful actually. And gives me hope that more are good than bad. They're just naive, ignorant and/or misled by the idealogues. Important to remember for the sake of one's soul.
That said I came to the comments to point out the following.
Note how they're "finalizing the story today"? That's some Bush League bullshit to drop on someone you're going to be obliquely accusing of toeing the Russian Party Line.
"Hey Candy! ☺️
You have thirty minutes to defend yourself against our Soft Accusations of Treason! Hope you're checking your email!!!! 🤗
Its probably a revolving door of reporters getting in, burning out immediately by the bullshit, then leaving. The ones that stay are idealogues willing to push the editorial agenda. Its no real wonder none of them know what previous generations of NYT newsies wrote/reported.
That would require actual WORK, and RESEARCHING what their fellow reporters have WRITTEN. Which means they'd have to READ.
These people... ARE stupid, afterall... and LAZY apparently.
well, that and they think the public at large is stupid.
Given their readership, though, I can't blame them on that...
Very insightful actually. And gives me hope that more are good than bad. They're just naive, ignorant and/or misled by the idealogues. Important to remember for the sake of one's soul.
That said I came to the comments to point out the following.
Note how they're "finalizing the story today"? That's some Bush League bullshit to drop on someone you're going to be obliquely accusing of toeing the Russian Party Line.
"Hey Candy! ☺️
You have thirty minutes to defend yourself against our Soft Accusations of Treason! Hope you're checking your email!!!! 🤗
Love, Xinthia"
Kind of like writers for the Simpsons...lol