Trump Sues Entire Treasonous Coup Co-Conspiracy - BOOMS INCOMING
(media.greatawakening.win)
💥 B O O O O O M 💥
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (41)
sorted by:
Unfortunately, a common law proceeding is not possible if "Attorneys" are involved. Their very role is to "Re-Present" the living man (Donald-Jon of the Trump family). They Re---Present the man as the fictional corporation entity (DONALD J TRUMP) and this is what enables admiralty/maritime courts to "Proceed", via the attorney "motions" which put the dead fictional entities literally into MOTION.
However, none of this precludes Trump from emerging victorious in the legal court proceeding. It just won't be a common law proceeding.
Call them what you will, but Lawyers, Attorneys, Barristers, et al. are not forbidden from applying the common Law....
For themselves, of course. But they are trained to operate solely in the maritime/admiratly courts as "Re- Presenters" of the fictional strawman trust corporation -> YOUR ALL CAPS NAME. They are trained to handle proceedings in "commercial courts" exclusively. All statutes, codes, acts, ordinances, decrees, etc. are part of the corporate commerce realm exclusively, and are utterly meaningless in a common law court. At best, some are REDUNDANT with the common law, rendering them pointless.
In fairness, an attorney could act as a "Counselor At-Law", but only in an advisory capacity for a client. The king/queen/nobleman must speak on one's on behalf in a common law proceeding. There is literally no NEED for an attorney as the jury can easily decide on whether wrong, harm or injury has been caused by the defendent(s) or not - no LEGAL training required, no knowledge of statutes needed.
And although I agree with you, that still doesn't bar them from using Common Law in any Court....
What does stop them, is as you said, their Training.....
It's why we need to destroy the system, and reset the our Original System....
I'm not saying an attorney could NOT, I'm saying an attorney is a very specific occupation that is only trained in the commercial court system. Their knowledge and training are entirely unnecessary in a common law court. Besides that, every word that spills out of an attorneys mouth would be hearsay, which isn't permitted in a common law court from anybody other than a witness.
That being said, anybody that wanted to have an attorney speak for themselves could do so theoretically, but to their great disadvantage for the reasons mentioned above. It just wouldn't make any sense.
There are no "rules" or "procedures" defined in common law proceedings. There is no "discovery", no "motions", no "summons", etc. All of which is the stuff of the LEGAL system exclusively. In a common law proceeding, you file your suit and when your court date arrives, you submit your evidence and call your witnesses in court for all to see - no "practice runs" and "legal strategizing" ahead of time. There are no statutes to consider, no procedures to follow. The jury hears the evidence and makes their determinations accordingly. It's all so simple really.
Anyway, I wholeheartedly agree that we need to destroy the free masons "LEGAL" system, which is simply an overlay "containment field" designed to complicate matters and enable justice only for those with the biggest of bucks. Ultimately it was designed to protect the cabal.