Trump Sues Entire Treasonous Coup Co-Conspiracy - BOOMS INCOMING
(media.greatawakening.win)
💥 B O O O O O M 💥
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (41)
sorted by:
I'm not saying an attorney could NOT, I'm saying an attorney is a very specific occupation that is only trained in the commercial court system. Their knowledge and training are entirely unnecessary in a common law court. Besides that, every word that spills out of an attorneys mouth would be hearsay, which isn't permitted in a common law court from anybody other than a witness.
That being said, anybody that wanted to have an attorney speak for themselves could do so theoretically, but to their great disadvantage for the reasons mentioned above. It just wouldn't make any sense.
There are no "rules" or "procedures" defined in common law proceedings. There is no "discovery", no "motions", no "summons", etc. All of which is the stuff of the LEGAL system exclusively. In a common law proceeding, you file your suit and when your court date arrives, you submit your evidence and call your witnesses in court for all to see - no "practice runs" and "legal strategizing" ahead of time. There are no statutes to consider, no procedures to follow. The jury hears the evidence and makes their determinations accordingly. It's all so simple really.
Anyway, I wholeheartedly agree that we need to destroy the free masons "LEGAL" system, which is simply an overlay "containment field" designed to complicate matters and enable justice only for those with the biggest of bucks. Ultimately it was designed to protect the cabal.
Yup, that's why it is called ""The CRIMINAL JUSTICE"" system, because the socalled "justice" they dole out is Criminal, and is not actually Justice, but some sort of payoff to their System, for their Profit and Gains.....
I understand actual Common Law, but currently, the closest we can get is Roman Civil Law.....
I don't like it at all, but it is what it is, until we finally come together and change it.....
Agreed.
Well, if you are capable of STANDING YOUR GROUND, and understanding you are only a MAN, and are capable of dodging and dashing the trickery of the judge, you could hold a common law proceeding yourself, and further, avoid a commercial legal proceeding. But you gotta know the trickery, inside and out. You don't learn it over night. We've been so brainwashed. It takes time to unwind.
The essence of the learning is understanding you are not any other title than a man - not an individual, human being, defendant, plaintiff, affiant, litigant, resident, citizen, taxpayer, and on and on. You do not "LIVE IN" "The United States of America", nor are you "RESIDENT OF" "The State of Florida", nor "The City of Miami", etc. Residents are corporate employees/dependents of the City/State/Country Corporation, so deceptively named.
But above all else, you have to be HONORABLE in front of that judge. If you're not, and can't hold your ground against him/her, it doesn't matter how much you know, how right you are, how many facts are on your side. Within their maritime system, honor trumps truth and facts. Such is the way it is.
If I had a nickel for every person I've watched go toe-to-toe with a judge and act like a D*$KH*#D, I'd be a rich man. They fail every time. They whine, groan and complain, demonstrating they consider themselves SUBORDINATE to the judge. It's like a dog smelling fear on a human - same thing.
You've got to stand up with a smile on your face, a pleasant demeanor in your actions and a firm grasp of the relationship between the KING (You) and the REFEREE (judge). No man STANDS ABOVE another. Which is why you can never agree that you "UNDER-STAND" the judge.
Ahhh, the games they play....
But the good news is, once you know, you know.
Bill Thornton has does some great seminars on EXACTLY how he's done this numerous times. He's the master at it...