I don't feel the press release from Josh Hawley gave enough information, so I researched the details and thought others would find it useful in forming their opinions. Do you feel the the details in the press release were sufficient?
Here something you overlooked. He was 18 and the kids that he was "dating" was 8 years old. He also ended up re offending a couple years later. He wasn't arrested for not responding to an undercover dummy. He actually did respond to an undercover and within 30minutes of meeting him was already talking about exchanging CP, some of which included middle school boys fucking. He uploaded 5 CP videos to YouTube all which included boys under 15, and then actively seeked to trade for more. Did you even read the email exchanges between him and the undercover? Why is everything about that case available EXCEPT the judges reasoning for giving him 3 months. That's sealed. Wonder why you overlooked that.
Not saying that excuses anyone or anything, but you should be fully aware of all the details. Here are some that were overlooked:
And your point would be???
None of those are mitigating circumstances in my opinion.
I don't feel the press release from Josh Hawley gave enough information, so I researched the details and thought others would find it useful in forming their opinions. Do you feel the the details in the press release were sufficient?
Here something you overlooked. He was 18 and the kids that he was "dating" was 8 years old. He also ended up re offending a couple years later. He wasn't arrested for not responding to an undercover dummy. He actually did respond to an undercover and within 30minutes of meeting him was already talking about exchanging CP, some of which included middle school boys fucking. He uploaded 5 CP videos to YouTube all which included boys under 15, and then actively seeked to trade for more. Did you even read the email exchanges between him and the undercover? Why is everything about that case available EXCEPT the judges reasoning for giving him 3 months. That's sealed. Wonder why you overlooked that.
My sources seem to be lacking if they didn't have those details, here's one. Care to share yours?
No mention of the 8yo, in fact they play up his interest in 12-16 year olds.
Any idea why the other side of the aisle recommended only 24 months?