Breast milk of jabbed woman, Dr. Carrie Madej: https://www.bitchute.com/video/al3TC2ZVTrac/
80% Inorganic
Toxicity Level was 8 of maximum of 10
Nutritional Level was 5 of a maximum of 10
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (33)
sorted by:
Inorganic matching the toxicity level is probably not a coincidence. From what I've read, the organic vs. inorganic % is based on the volume of contaminants in the milk itself. My assumption (not a tittie doctor) is that this means that out of 100% of the milk (minus water content), 80% of the volume is tainted with a non-organic substance.
Toxicity = 8/10 would indicate to me that the total volume of toxic/foreign material is not only synthetic, but also toxic.
Perhaps they did? Didn't get to see the report results... but, yeah, agreed. Seeing the actual data would be helpful here!
Almost sounds like they are sensationalizing the actual composition of breast milk.
GMO's are not organic, by definition.
Organic when used to refer to label food products does not mean the same as organic when used in chemistry.
Inorganic is a chemistry term, and a food product would just be referred to as not being organic (unless it literally is entirely non-carbon-based).
Yes, I know. A person who has taken an mRNA "vax" is a genetically modified organism, a GMO, and thus while he or she is still a carbon-based lifeform ("organic" in the scientific sense of the term), he or she is ALSO "non-organic" in the most common use of the term today (and to the USDA, of course).
Ok, if we’re using USDA classifications for humans and human-based foods, we can probably agree that something can be either organic (unmodified) or not organic (modified).
What do you think the dr/scientist/woman in this video means when she refers to milk as being just 80% inorganic.
I’m betting it’s the 80% H2O content, but I’d love to hear your thoughts.