Is the order of the race completely random, meaning the race itself is not rigged, but the dates are cast by the order of the horse?
I don't know. They may adhere to it like a Zodiac or Tarot card reading.
Half of them, to this day, might think of it as a lottery, never knowing the higher ups rigged every minute detail.
I can't be sure of any of this, because I don't have enough first-hand experience with horse racing.
What I do know for certain is that dozens of sealed horse trailers offers a fantastic opportunity to traffic the highest-priced sex slaves.
What if the horse is a proxy for a sex slave? Lots of horses change hands at these events. Millions of bucks for a horse that might only place 10th. Where's the return on that investment.
The only problem I can see with allowing the race to be random, is that it would require preparation ahead of time to be ready to go with whatever event each horse represented. You might have months before your assigned event, or merely weeks (assuming the horse's number was a date.)
I don't think they also control every little thing. I think they are more superstitious than we realize and sometimes they need these rituals to "tell" them the order they should do things in.
The events might be pre-decided but the order might be left to "fate".
Also I think past Derbies were controlled by DS, but I don't think this recent one was. This recent one gave more of a white hat controlled event to me. That's just my feeling.
Race horses = political races = politicians -- makes sense
As for the dating of events...
Are you suggesting that the DS rigs the entire race and the order for every horse?
Or
Is the order of the race completely random, meaning the race itself is not rigged, but the dates are cast by the order of the horse?
I don't know. They may adhere to it like a Zodiac or Tarot card reading.
Half of them, to this day, might think of it as a lottery, never knowing the higher ups rigged every minute detail.
I can't be sure of any of this, because I don't have enough first-hand experience with horse racing.
What I do know for certain is that dozens of sealed horse trailers offers a fantastic opportunity to traffic the highest-priced sex slaves.
What if the horse is a proxy for a sex slave? Lots of horses change hands at these events. Millions of bucks for a horse that might only place 10th. Where's the return on that investment.
The only problem I can see with allowing the race to be random, is that it would require preparation ahead of time to be ready to go with whatever event each horse represented. You might have months before your assigned event, or merely weeks (assuming the horse's number was a date.)
Well they could let some of it be random because that "fate" decides the order they'll do certain events in.
sidenote there was this post about "epicenters":
https://greatawakening.win/p/15Hv2ILsMJ/the-two-epicenters-of-the-biden-/
I don't think they also control every little thing. I think they are more superstitious than we realize and sometimes they need these rituals to "tell" them the order they should do things in.
The events might be pre-decided but the order might be left to "fate".
Also I think past Derbies were controlled by DS, but I don't think this recent one was. This recent one gave more of a white hat controlled event to me. That's just my feeling.
If it's a narrative reveal situation, the order might not really matter.
Like movie releases. The movies are done upwards of several years before their release.
Sometimes movies drop because it's strategically best to do so.
Others, like horror movies, are better dropped in October.
There's a number of factors.
Again, I'm not great at deciphering a definite message, only at offering possible meanings.