TRUMP IN MICHIGAN: "We still got cards to play... and we know when to play them... The Space Force will be very important..."
(media.greatawakening.win)
LET'S GOOoOo
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (339)
sorted by:
Nothing you said is relevant to my question. I don’t care about the CIA, or the term conspiracy theorist, or the shape and parallax of the moon. I also don’t care what the shape of objects in the sky are. You believe that the earth is a ball with 25k mile circumference. That means there will be curvature of 8” per mile squared. I ask again, are you able to demonstrate this curvature to me without using NASA as a source?
I didnt use NASA as a source. I used my own eyes, my own telescope. And it is relevant. If the moon is a sphere why wouldnt the earth be?
You flat earthers are delusional or feds.
“Which if you look how they figured this stuff out in the first place there multiple easy ways to prove it.” Alright then, so easily do it for me? This guy said the moon was proof the earth is a globe. Can you do a bit better than that?
That’s a retarded argument. “Something else is a sphere, so this must be a sphere too.” Why do you need to use lights in the sky as evidence that you’re on a sphere? Wouldn’t there be some better evidence like the physical curve? I’m not a flat earther. You’re a ball earther, even though you have no physical proof. A belief taught to you by free masons.
Im done your delusions will not allow the truth in. Have a good fantasy life.
I think he means "show us the curve ball" down here which means at the "SEA LEVEL". OMG SMH.
Easily. Earth's features can be contiguously mapped only onto a sphere. Trying to do it as a flat surface results in discrepancies over long distances. There is also the fact that we have been circumnavigating a sphere since Magellan. No NASA required.
Can you map Antarctica? Can you go to Antarctica? Can you map a place you’re not allowed to go to? Have you ever personally mapped anything? Do you trust the maps you’ve been given? Can you navigate using a flat map? Is circumnavigation only possible on a globe or is there another possible model? How are maps and circumnavigation “proof” of spherical earth? Isn’t there some sort of physical evidence you can provide? Why not?
The 8” per mile squared assumes that the Earth is a parabola, not a sphere.
The math is still correct for distances up to a limit. The formula begins to lose accuracy after very long distances. For the purposes of demonstrating the curve, or for figuring out whether an object should be behind the horizon, this formula is adequate.
But you are leaving out atmospheric refraction. In the radio spectrum, this has given rise to the "4/3 Earth" model, where to take refraction into account, horizon visibility is calculated as though the Earth optical radius were a third greater than the physical radius. It also occurs in the visible spectrum. When the Sun's disk is visibly touching the horizon, it is already below the physical horizon.
Even when accounting for atmospheric refraction, are there any long distance objects visible that shouldn’t be? Can refraction be used to explain away all of these objects?
The point is that you asked: "That means there will be curvature of 8” per mile squared. I ask again, are you able to demonstrate this curvature to me without using NASA as a source?"
And the answer is obviously no - because it is a false assumption about the curvature rate.
Demonstrating the curvature of the Earth is simple in a number of ways. The fact that difference constellations are either visible or not visible from different points on the Earth show that straight up is a different direction from different points on the Earth.
so flashing lights in the sky are your physical proof of curvature of earth? thats very puzzling to me. couldn't we just measure the curve? do you understand spherical geometry? can you provide me with the formula for determining the curvature rate of a 25k mile circumference sphere?